2003
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/15/31/313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crack fronts and damage in glass at the nanometre scale

Abstract: Abstract. We have studied the low speed fracture regime for different glassy materials with variable but controlled length scales of heterogeneity in a carefully mastered surrounding atmosphere. By using optical and atomic force microscopy (AFM) techniques we tracked in real-time the crack tip propagation at the nanometer scale on a wide velocity range (10 −3 − 10 −12 m/s and below). The influence of the heterogeneities on this velocity is presented and discussed. Our experiments reveal also -for the first tim… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
24
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, crack growth is intermittent and dominated by the accelerating phases corresponding to the cavity coalescence with the main CT. (iii) The nanocavitation process provides the dominant mechanism responsible for damage spreading within the process zone. Observations of damage cavities in amorphous Silica under stress corrosion are consistent to what was observed experimentally in Aluminosilicate glasses under stress corrosion (Célarié et al, 2003a, b;Marlière et al, 2003), and numerically during dynamic failure of amorphous Silica Rountree et al, 2002;Kalia et al, 2003). This indicates that the existence of this nanoductile mode is inherent to the amorphous structure and does not depend on the precise glass composition.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In other words, crack growth is intermittent and dominated by the accelerating phases corresponding to the cavity coalescence with the main CT. (iii) The nanocavitation process provides the dominant mechanism responsible for damage spreading within the process zone. Observations of damage cavities in amorphous Silica under stress corrosion are consistent to what was observed experimentally in Aluminosilicate glasses under stress corrosion (Célarié et al, 2003a, b;Marlière et al, 2003), and numerically during dynamic failure of amorphous Silica Rountree et al, 2002;Kalia et al, 2003). This indicates that the existence of this nanoductile mode is inherent to the amorphous structure and does not depend on the precise glass composition.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Observations of damage cavities in amorphous silica under stress corrosion are consistent with what was observed experimentally in aluminosilicate vitroceramics under stress corrosion by Célarié et al (2003a,b) and Marlière et al (2003), and numerically during dynamic failure of amorphous silica by Van Brutzel et al (2002), Rountree et al (2002) and Kalia et al (2003). This indicates that the origin of such a nanoscale damage mode is inherent to the amorphous structure and does not depend on the precise glass composition.…”
Section: Discussion: On the Relevant Lengthscalessupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, it was demonstrated that brittle materials can also demonstrate a ductile response before onset of crack formation at a specific crossover length of order 10 nm in glass. 5 Control of the local temperature and its distribution inside transparent materials at the focus allows one to tune a thermal stress for a desired application, e.g., a 3D dicing (a controlled cleaving) would require a controlled crack propagation, while the optical memory and waveguide recording would benefit from prevention of the crack formation by material softening/ melting.The aim of this work was to investigate the effect of thermal accumulation on 3D laser recording by 12 ps duration, 355 nm wavelength pulses at a high (80 MHz) repetition rate inside glass. The experimental results are compared with those of theoretical modeling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%