2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.crme.2017.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crack identification method in beam-like structures using changes in experimentally measured frequencies and Particle Swarm Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The regression equations for the selected responses, as given by Eqs. (2)(3), are further used as fitness function for process optimization using GA.…”
Section: Genetic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The regression equations for the selected responses, as given by Eqs. (2)(3), are further used as fitness function for process optimization using GA.…”
Section: Genetic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crack length and crack propagation data have been linked with statistical moments, frequency spectra, and wavelet coefficient data. Khatir et al [2] used experimentally determined natural frequencies along with the particle swarm optimization (PSO) technique to detect an open crack on a cantilever beam made up of steel. Genetic algorithm (GA) is an optimization method which is bio-inspired, and it supports the ideas of natural genetics and selection theories as proposed by Charles Darwin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 15 ] Khatir et al performed an experimental and numerical study to FEM updating, identify crack locations and their depth using PSO and natural frequency differences. [ 16 ] Chen and Yu have applied the hybrid PSO and Monte Carlo simulations to damage detection and severity identification of damaged elements in beam‐like structures. The above‐described results have been validated numerically and experimentally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They solve an inverse problem by building a physics-based model and then updating its parameters until the response of the model matches that which is measured in the real structure. Although this approach is currently under exhaustive research [19][20][21][22][23][24][25], it still presents some drawbacks in the assessment of real systems. Such drawbacks include the need for high-quality data and the impossibility to provide real-time insight due to the computational effort required to solve the updating problem [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%