2002
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2002)128:9(1195)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cracking and Deformability of Concrete Flexural Sections with Fiber Reinforced Polymer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the reinforcement ratio is greater than the balanced ratio (ρ f > ρ fb ), the section is over-reinforced and failure by concrete crushing occurs. Studies show that a beam experiencing an FRP rupture exhibits less ductility than one experiencing concrete crushing (Newhook et al 2002;ACI 440.1R-06 2006).…”
Section: Comparison Of Analytical and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the reinforcement ratio is greater than the balanced ratio (ρ f > ρ fb ), the section is over-reinforced and failure by concrete crushing occurs. Studies show that a beam experiencing an FRP rupture exhibits less ductility than one experiencing concrete crushing (Newhook et al 2002;ACI 440.1R-06 2006).…”
Section: Comparison Of Analytical and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of their low modulus of elasticity, the deflection criterion may control the design of intermediate and long beams reinforced with GFRP bars. Therefore, the design of FRP-reinforced concrete beams is usually governed by the serviceability limit state requirements (crack width and deflection criteria) rather than ultimate limit state requirements (Newhook et al 2002). Consequently, a method is needed to predict the expected service load deflections of FRP-reinforced members with a reasonably high degree of accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code requires that the deformability factor be greater than 4 and 6 for rectangular‐ and T‐sections, respectively. Newhook et al 64. and Dolan et al 65.…”
Section: Use Of Frp In Partial Prestressingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…recommended the deformability factor to be 4 or above for all concrete sections reinforced with FRP materials with the moment and the curvature at service taken at the FRP strain of 0.002. After setting an upper limit on the cross‐sectional area of the FRP, Newhook et al 64. concluded that no calculations will be necessary to check the deformability of nonprestressed FRP reinforced beams.…”
Section: Use Of Frp In Partial Prestressingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this technique triggers a premature debonding failure resulting in loss of sufficient ductility [2][3][4]. In general, the following failure modes were observed and identified for FRP strengthened beams [5][6][7]:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%