2011
DOI: 10.1002/jhm.902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cracking the case

Abstract: The approach to clinical conundrums by an expert clinician is revealed through presentation of an actual patient's case in an approach typical of morning report. Similar to patient care, sequential pieces of information are provided to the clinician who is unfamiliar with the case. The focus is on the thought processes of both the clinical team caring for the patient and the discussant. A 43-year-old woman presented to an outside hospital with painful plaques and patches on her bilateral lower extremities. Two… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The questionnaire used for the study incorporated three previously published instruments [ 5 , 15 , 16 ]. There were two versions of the questionnaire tailored to outgoing versus incoming nurses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The questionnaire used for the study incorporated three previously published instruments [ 5 , 15 , 16 ]. There were two versions of the questionnaire tailored to outgoing versus incoming nurses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were two versions of the questionnaire tailored to outgoing versus incoming nurses. In both cases, participants were asked to provide (1) their judgment of each patient’s risk of deterioration on a 7-point scale (patient acuity rating) [ 16 ], (2) their experience of the interaction with an instrument that was used in a previous study of nursing handoff (seven items for outgoing, nine items for incoming) [ 5 ], and (3) their perceived cognitive load (the effort or burden on their working memory) during the interaction on a 9-point scale [ 15 ]. Participants rated the risk of deterioration for every patient they handed off; they also rated their experience of the interaction and their cognitive load for each interaction (set of handoffs).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%