2016
DOI: 10.15376/biores.11.4.8981-9001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cradle-to-Gate Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of the Portfolio of an Innovative Forest Products Manufacturing Unit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the purposes of this study, the commercial buildings were assumed to be located in Vancouver, Canada, as there are benchmarks for energy and emissions within various locations. To focus exclusively on near term embodied emissions, carbon storage in the timber material was excluded [41,42]. e carbon intensity of the CLTfrom Athena was compared with available environmental product declaration values from major CLT producers in Canada [43,44] and was found to overestimate the intensity by 15-30%.…”
Section: Deflectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purposes of this study, the commercial buildings were assumed to be located in Vancouver, Canada, as there are benchmarks for energy and emissions within various locations. To focus exclusively on near term embodied emissions, carbon storage in the timber material was excluded [41,42]. e carbon intensity of the CLTfrom Athena was compared with available environmental product declaration values from major CLT producers in Canada [43,44] and was found to overestimate the intensity by 15-30%.…”
Section: Deflectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology adopted in the study is the Life Cycle Assessment method following the ISO 14040/44 (ISO 2006a; ISO 2006b) standards and used in similar studies (Laurent et al 2016;Ratnasingam et al 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 presents the impact categories and units for ReCiPe 2016 midpoints. Normally, not all these categories are included in LCA published in literature, except the most important ones (ADP, abiotic depletion potential; AP, acidification potential; EP, eutrophication potential; GWP, global warming potential; ODP, ozone layer depletion potential; POP, photochemical oxidation potential) as reported in several studies [13,21,35]. However, all impact categories were analyzed in this work to improve the information for further research.…”
Section: Life Cycle Assessment (Lca) Methodology and Impact Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since cellulase can be obtained by different processes, it is considered worthy of investigation to assess the environmental impacts of these different approaches. When obtaining products with lower environmental impacts, they must be evaluated to be advantageous, especially in sectors with strong competition [21]. This comparison among the different production techniques can be useful to clarify the advantages and disadvantages of each process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%