Crafting electricity through social protest: Afro-descendant and indigenous Embera communities protesting for hydroelectric infrastructure in Utría National Park, Colombia

Abstract

Development infrastructure is often discussed in terms of opposition by local and indigenous communities. Based on ethnographic fieldwork, we present the case of local indigenous Embera and Afro-descendant communities in Chocó, Colombia, that protested first to gain, and later to maintain access to electricity produced by the Mutatá hydroelectric dam in Utría National Park. In the context of development politics, taking into account the revised Colombian Constitution of 1991, we explore the motivations and expectations that underpinned these two protests. We contextualize the Afro-descendant community’s protests for development as a continuation of the Afro-descendant peoples’ struggle for social and political participation. We argue, on the other hand, that the Embera’s participation implies both an act of solidarity with their Afro-descendant kin and a performance of what Herbert Marcuse has called Refusal, in the context of late-industrial society. We use this case to help address potentially overlooked subtleties in the representation of the postcolonial subject in development politics, showing how long-term historical structures, reaching back to Spanish colonialization, continue to permeate and shape the desired futures in both communities as well as the ways in which they engage with and reject the contemporary Colombian state’s project of development.

Negotiating Narratives of ‘Good’: A Model of Public Value Adaptation in a Grand Challenge Intervention

“…This simplistic view neglects the beneficial role of conflict between organizations and society and suggests consensus; it therefore fails to accommodate public value misalignment, which can lead to the failure of interventions and unintended consequences. For example, rural electrification initiatives remain tightly bound to neoliberal ideas that foster prosperity through efficiency and the privatization of public services (Wang, Wang and Ahn, 2021), bound up with notions of what a society ought to have (Acosta García and Farrell, 2019;Gecas, 2008). This neglects the importance of negotiation between organizations and society to manage ongoing processes of change (Zurba, 2019), limiting 'dialogical' communication (Beebeejaun et al, 2015), which is restricted by normative hierarchical power relations, rather than capitalizing on the democratic benefits of differing views.…”

Interventions on Democratizing Infrastructure

“…It is imperative to recognise how infrastructures are reproductive of inequalities (Tonkiss, 2015), and indeed are political from their inception, while still on the drawing board (Bridge et al, 2018;Hecht, 2011). Different controversies may surround different types of infrastructure (Hönke and Cuesta Fernández, 2018;Sovacool & Cooper, 2013), and communities may organise to demand access to new infrastructure, such as electricity grids (García & Farrell, 2019).…”

Powering racial capitalism: Electricity, rate-making, and the uneven energy geographies of Atlanta

“…Electricity as it circulates within and powers racial capitalism remains understudied with important exceptions that analyze the discriminatory history of electrification and access to regular and affordable electricity service in Black, Indigenous, and other marginalized, especially rural, communities (see Acosta García and Farrell, 2019; Harrison, 2016; McDonald, 2009; Needham, 2014). A growing body of energy justice literature also considers racial disparities in utility disconnections and access to renewable energy and energy efficiency (see Fairchild and Weinrub, 2017; Franklin et al., 2017; Reames, 2016; Lewis et al., 2020).…”