2012
DOI: 10.1002/dac.2403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cramer–Rao bound based mean‐squared error and throughput analysis of superimposed pilots for semi‐blind multiple‐input multiple‐output wireless channel estimation

Abstract: SUMMARYThis work presents a study of the mean‐squared error (MSE) and throughput performance of superimposed pilots (SP) for the estimation of a multiple‐input multiple‐output (MIMO) wireless channel. The Cramer–Rao bound (CRB) is derived for SP based estimation of the MIMO channel matrix. Employing the CRB analysis, it is proved that the asymptotic MSE bound is potentially 3 dB lower than the MSE performance of the existing SP mean based estimation (SPME) schemes. Motivated by this observation, a novel SP sem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the performance of data detection algorithms mainly depends on crucial information accuracy. Various techniques including blind and semi-blind methods [3][4][5][6][7][8] and pilot-based methods [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] have been represented for channel estimation. Most of the blind methods intrinsically have low convergence rate and weak performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the performance of data detection algorithms mainly depends on crucial information accuracy. Various techniques including blind and semi-blind methods [3][4][5][6][7][8] and pilot-based methods [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] have been represented for channel estimation. Most of the blind methods intrinsically have low convergence rate and weak performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many estimation literatures have appeared, but most of them have the common assumption of the available perfect channel state information at the FC [2][3][4][5][6]. However, this assumption is not realistic, and there always exists estimation error in the case of channel estimation [7,8]. And the channel estimation error can degrade the estimation performance in practical occasion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adaptive system identification (ASI) includes many applications such as interference cancelation [1][2][3], spectral subtraction [4,5], wireless localization [6][7][8][9], channel equalization [10][11][12][13], and adaptive beamforming [14]. One of most popular algorithms is least mean square (LMS), which is proposed by Widrow et al [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%