2020
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2020.2992855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cramér-Rao Bound for DOA Estimators Under the Partial Relaxation Framework: Derivation and Comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we will see, the processes in (3) and ( 4), although having the same spectra and covariance functions, display considerable differences when it comes to estimating the covariances (5). In particular, we will show that the convergence, as T → ∞, of the covariance estimates to their respective expectations depend on the structures of dµ x and dµ y , as well as on the choice of model ( 3) or (4). Specifically, we are interested in under what conditions the estimators in (5) are consistent estimators.…”
Section: Signal Modelmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As we will see, the processes in (3) and ( 4), although having the same spectra and covariance functions, display considerable differences when it comes to estimating the covariances (5). In particular, we will show that the convergence, as T → ∞, of the covariance estimates to their respective expectations depend on the structures of dµ x and dµ y , as well as on the choice of model ( 3) or (4). Specifically, we are interested in under what conditions the estimators in (5) are consistent estimators.…”
Section: Signal Modelmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Modeling signals that impinge on sensor arrays appear in a large variety of signal processing applications, including radar, sonar, and audio signal processing [1]- [3]. Commonly in such applications, one seeks a spatial spectrum, describing the distribution of signal energy over the space of interest, e.g., azimuth and elevation in direction of arrival (DoA) estimation [4], allowing for localizing and tracking targets [5], [6] or for performing spatial filtering of the sensor signals [7]. In practice, the spatial spectrum is often inferred from the array covariance matrix as in, e.g., optimal filtering such as the Capon method [8], subspace methods as ESPRIT and MUSIC [9], [10], as well as more recent contributions exploiting sparse representations [11] as well as knowledge of underlying dynamics [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (2), the speckles d(t) and e(t) are i.i.d. vectors drawn from d(t) ∼ CN (0, I) and e(t) ∼ CN 0, σ 2 I , respectively.…”
Section: Signal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a class of Direction-of-Arrival (DOA) estimators have been proposed under the Partial Relaxation (PR) framework [1,2]. Similar to the MUSIC algorithm [3], PR estimators employ a one-dimensional spectral search to estimate the DOAs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The popularity of the subspace-based methods over, for example, near optimal maximum likelihood (ML) estimators [19]- [21], comes from the fact that they achieve good estimation accuracy along with affordable computational complexity in contrast to the prohibitive computational cost of implementing ML estimators. In recent years, several works have proposed competitive algorithms to fill the performance gap between subspace-based methods and ML estimators including root-swap root-MUSIC [22], enhanced principal-singular-vector utilization for modal analysis (EPUMA) [23], standard ESPRIT using generalized least squares (SE GLS) and unitary ESPRIT using generalized least squares (UE GLS) [24], partial relaxation (PR)-based approaches [25], [26], root-clustering algorithm and root-certificate algorithm [27]. The aim of the aforementioned methods is to achieve an adequate performance in challenging scenarios like scarcity of available data samples, low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and/or presence of some correlated or even coherent sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%