2016
DOI: 10.1111/joa.12456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cranial biomechanics, bite force and function of the endocranial sinuses in Diprotodon optatum, the largest known marsupial

Abstract: The giant extinct marsupial Diprotodon optatum has unusual skull morphology for an animal of its size, consisting of very thin bone and large cranial sinuses that occupy most of the internal cranial space. The function of these sinuses is unknown as there are no living marsupial analogues. The finite element method was applied to identify areas of high and low stress, and estimate the bite force of Diprotodon to test hypotheses on the function of the extensive cranial sinuses. Detailed three-dimensional models… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is also the case in T. ornatus, but its values of im∆SEa are only slightly higher than one. This is notable because the main function of the sinuses is thought to be involved in stress dissipation during feeding and to provide skull structural stability (20)(21)(22). However, the analyses of von Mises stress in M. ursinus and U. americanus reveal higher stresses in models with sinuses than in models without sinuses (Figs.…”
Section: Sinus Size and Feeding Biomechanics In Living And Extinct Bearsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is also the case in T. ornatus, but its values of im∆SEa are only slightly higher than one. This is notable because the main function of the sinuses is thought to be involved in stress dissipation during feeding and to provide skull structural stability (20)(21)(22). However, the analyses of von Mises stress in M. ursinus and U. americanus reveal higher stresses in models with sinuses than in models without sinuses (Figs.…”
Section: Sinus Size and Feeding Biomechanics In Living And Extinct Bearsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To test whether the extremely developed sinuses in the cave bear influence its biomechanical performance for feeding behavior, we eliminated virtually the paranasal sinuses by filling the cavities with artificial bone material using Geomagic (21,22). The sinuses have a potential dual effect on feeding biomechanics (i) for having large empty spaces in the paranasal cavities and (ii) for the appearance of a dome as a consequence of sinus inflation on the frontal area.…”
Section: Fea Of the Skull Without Sinusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, special attention is needed when trying to predict the biomechanical response of the craniofacial skeleton of extinct species [12]. The individual mechanical properties of the calvarial three-layered system are relevant to understand not only the functional response of the skull, but also its biomechanics, so clinical, functional, and anthropological models of the skull may be evaluated properly [31][32][33]. Additionally, understanding of the mechanical properties of the components of the cranial vault would make possible the development of better synthetic bone substitutes for the cranium [34].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, several finite element models (FEM) of the skull have been built using the information available for the engineering sandwich structure and the available mechanical properties. Consequently, most of the FEM of the skull can be grouped into one of four categories: (1) FEM of the skull built using a single isotropic material for an averaged layer in the entire calvarial structure [32]. (2) FEM of the skull including an anisotropic condition of the material for a single layered structure [37].…”
Section: Numerical Model Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, typically stress and strain values are only reported and analysed from just a few elements (Porro et al, 2013;Fitton et al, 2012a). Alternatively average or peak stress or strain values can be computed for whole models (Dumont et al, 2011;Cox et al, 2012;Parr et al, 2013;Sharp and Rich, 2016) or selected regions (Wroe et al, 2007a,b;Nakashige et al, 2011).…”
Section: Comparison With Common Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%