“…Histologically, optic disc drusen are laminated basophilic concretions always located in front of the lamina cribrosa, while astrocytic hamarto mas are composed of astrocytic cells wich develop more superficially in the papilla and adjacent retina [3]. Clinically, drusen appear as yellowhish grape-like clusters at the sur face of the disc, or as pseudopapilledcma in case of buried drusen [4]; astrocytic hamar tomas present as whitish or yellowish masses, which usually have a nodular or mulberry-like surface and have been de scribed as resembling a localized accumula tion of frog eggs or tapioca grains [5], Both lesions, often being calcified, have a characteristic and quite similar CT-scan ap pearance: drusen present the aspect of welldefined and punctual calcifications, strictly located within the optic nerve head [6,7]; CT-scan appearance of astrocytic hamar toma was first described by Daily et al [8] as a more voluminous mass; in our case, we did not observe a notable difference between CT-scan appearance of astrocytic hamarto mas and optic nerve head drusen previously reported [7], In other respects, CT scan al lows the diagnosis of intracranial abnormal ities of tuberous sclerosis, especially sube pendymal calcifications [9].…”