1975
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330420310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cranial dysraphism mistaken for trephination

Abstract: Attention is called to a disputed diagnosis of trephination reported for a perforated skull of a prehistoric New England Indian. The perforation, surrounded by a saucer-like depression, is located exactly in the midline just in front of bregma. The finding of a similar lesion in a prehistoric Indian skull from the North Coast of Peru--where, as in New England, good evidence of the practice of trephination is lacking--provides support for a more reasonable diagnosis for both cases: congenital cranial dysraphism… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cranial variant observed on this calvarium is centred at bregma, though the intersection of the coronal and sagittal sutures is still visible (Figure ). The defect is a depression of the bone, ellipsoid in shape, and is similar to what several authors describe as a “saucer” (Gass, ; Ortner, ; Stewart, ; Webb & Thorne, ). The depression is smooth walled and shows no exposure of the diploë, signs of bone resorption, or porosity.…”
Section: Descriptionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The cranial variant observed on this calvarium is centred at bregma, though the intersection of the coronal and sagittal sutures is still visible (Figure ). The defect is a depression of the bone, ellipsoid in shape, and is similar to what several authors describe as a “saucer” (Gass, ; Ortner, ; Stewart, ; Webb & Thorne, ). The depression is smooth walled and shows no exposure of the diploë, signs of bone resorption, or porosity.…”
Section: Descriptionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The majority of the bioarchaeological literature identifies defects located at bregma as congenital herniations/dysraphisms (Gass, ; Ortner, ; Powell, ; Stewart, ; Webb & Thorne, ), although some lesions are more difficult to assess resulting in diagnoses that remain undifferentiated (Blau, ; Sublett & Wray, ). Only six examples of defects at bregma exist in the literature and consistent in each of these papers is the description of the shape, position, and location of the defect (Table ).…”
Section: Bioarchaeological Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These include biparietal atrophy (Ortner, 2003), and the congenital meningocoele (Stewart, 1975;Webb & Thorne, 1985). The whole of the defect is also not consistent with trepanning (Ackerknecht, 1967;Lisowsky, 1967;Stewart, 1975), which has not, in any case, been documented in any sample from east Tennessee or the broader environs. The presence of necrotising bone in the wound bed of Burial 21 also suggests that an interventive debridement for a scalping survivor (essentially trepanning) did not occur.…”
Section: Burial 21 From the Hampton Sitementioning
confidence: 87%
“…Stewart (1975) points out that survival with a meningocoele in a prehistoric community before adequate surgical techniques were available would have been low, except for those individuals having small dysraphisms. Obviously, those persons having delicate soft tissues exposed would be very susceptible to head trauma, infection, and death resulting from meningitis or some similar condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%