2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2012.00952.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cranial size and shape variation in mainland and island populations of the quokka

Abstract: The disjunct distribution of the quokka enabled this study to investigate cranial morphological variation in relation to insularity and latitude. Crania from mainland locations in south‐western Australia and from two islands were examined. Thirty‐eight three‐dimensional homologous landmarks were digitized on 110 quokka crania. The landmark data were first subjected to generalized Procrustes Analysis, followed by principal components analysis. General linear regression was used to test whether quokka cranial si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, the authors postulated that a CREA-like pattern is not allometric and instead purely due to biomechanics. CREA-like shape variation is also found in other kangaroo species, and is allometric in tammar wallabies [51] and quokkas [20], but only partially so among the rock wallabies [15]. By contrast, geometric morphometric analyses of two marsupial species with a comparatively soft dietthe insectivorous Dromiciops gliroides and two species of the omnivorous Caluromysshow little cranial variation of zygomatic arch or rostrum shape, but strong within-species allometry [21,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead, the authors postulated that a CREA-like pattern is not allometric and instead purely due to biomechanics. CREA-like shape variation is also found in other kangaroo species, and is allometric in tammar wallabies [51] and quokkas [20], but only partially so among the rock wallabies [15]. By contrast, geometric morphometric analyses of two marsupial species with a comparatively soft dietthe insectivorous Dromiciops gliroides and two species of the omnivorous Caluromysshow little cranial variation of zygomatic arch or rostrum shape, but strong within-species allometry [21,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Suggestions of a constraint on marsupial skull shape through static allometry are at odds with several geometric morphometric studies that show only low or moderate levels of static allometry in marsupial crania [15,[20][21][22]. Two recent studies on kangaroos even suggested that allometry plays a lesser role in shaping cranial variation in this group, instead positing fast adaptation or individual developmental plasticity of the masticatory apparatus as the main driver [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, the authors postulated that a CREA-like pattern is not allometric and instead purely due to biomechanics. CREA-like shape variation is also found in other kangaroo species, and is allometric in tammar wallabies [60] and quokkas [20], but only partially so among the rock wallabies [15]. By contrast, geometric morphometric analyses of two marsupial species with a comparatively soft dietthe insectivorous Dromiciops gliroides and two species of the omnivorous Caluromys -show little cranial variation of zygomatic arch or rostrum shape, but strong-species allometry [21,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Suggestions of a constraint on marsupial skull shape through static allometry are at odds with several geometric morphometric studies that show only low or moderate levels of static allometry in marsupial crania [15,[20][21][22]. Two recent studies on kangaroos even suggested that allometry plays a lesser role in shaping cranial variation in this group, instead positing fast adaptation or individual developmental plasticity of the masticatory apparatus as the main driver [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, relative age of each individual was determined through measurement of their molar index (MI) – the number of molars in front of the anterior zygomatic arch of the skull (Kirkpatrick, ). The MI value increases steadily with age and can be used as a proxy for age within macropodid species (Hadley, Milne & Schmitt, ; Dawson & Milne, ). Specimens under MI of two were judged to be juvenile (Jackson, ) and were removed from the sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%