1997
DOI: 10.1097/00001665-199711000-00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Craniofacial Behavior of Sutures in Young Rabbits Postimmobilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar result was found by FERRI et al 5 , whose study showed restricted development in the coronal suture area without changes in total anteroposterior length.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A similar result was found by FERRI et al 5 , whose study showed restricted development in the coronal suture area without changes in total anteroposterior length.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It has been suggested that fetal head constraint contributes to craniosynostosis [24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. However, postnatal extrinsic pressure may cause deformational cranial vault changes, not synostosis [31,32,33,34]. The important aspects of surgical correction include release or excision of cranial sutures and cranial vault expansion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, physical constraint of the head does not always result in craniosynostosis. Despite studies suggesting that in utero constraint leads to craniosynostosis (Graham et al, 1979, 1980; Higginbottom et al, 1980), other studies have concluded that constraint leads only to deformation of the skull while sutures remain patent (Ferri et al, 1997; Bradley et al, 2000). Thus, we have little understanding of the relationship of physical constraint to suture fusion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%