1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0901-5027(05)80466-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Craniofacial growth in bilateral cleft lip and palate patients following secondary premaxillary setback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our second objective was to assess growth restriction in SRP as it is a still debated risk in available mid- or long-term studies (Vargervik, 1983; Friede and Pruzansky, 1985; Marinho et al, 1995; Padwa et al, 1999). Growth was assessed through occlusal features, skeletal growth parameter and Delaire analysis drawings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our second objective was to assess growth restriction in SRP as it is a still debated risk in available mid- or long-term studies (Vargervik, 1983; Friede and Pruzansky, 1985; Marinho et al, 1995; Padwa et al, 1999). Growth was assessed through occlusal features, skeletal growth parameter and Delaire analysis drawings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benefits of the surgery have to be balanced with the risk of complication such as premaxilla necrosis and pseudoarthrosis. Secondary growth impairment has also been reported in longterm follow-up studies but it is a still debated risk (Vargervik, 1983;Friede and Pruzansky, 1985;Marinho et al, 1995;Padwa et al, 1999). Vargervik (1983) compared 12 early setbacks to patients carrying BCLP without setback.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The long term results in our BCLP group were satisfactory (Chapter 6). In a recent study of Marinho et al (1995) on 10 BCLP patients who underwent secondary premaxillary setback, good results were equally observed in comparison with the BCLP group of Oslo. Nevertheless, in contrast to our study, their patients showed even more concave profiles than those belonging to the Oslo group.…”
Section: Surgical Repositioning Of the Premaxillamentioning
confidence: 92%