2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.05.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Craniofacial morphology of HIV-positive children and adolescents undergoing antiretroviral therapy: A pilot study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to design a systematic and standardized radiographic assessment of the development of the CV, sample matching was performed. Similar strategy was previously performed in studies on craniofacial ( 17 ) and dental ( 18 ) development of HIV infected children. To accomplish this task a reference sample (group 2: non-infected children, mean age: 10.17 years ±1.68) with age and sex compatible with the study group (group 1: HIV infected children, 10.26 years ±1.71) was selected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In order to design a systematic and standardized radiographic assessment of the development of the CV, sample matching was performed. Similar strategy was previously performed in studies on craniofacial ( 17 ) and dental ( 18 ) development of HIV infected children. To accomplish this task a reference sample (group 2: non-infected children, mean age: 10.17 years ±1.68) with age and sex compatible with the study group (group 1: HIV infected children, 10.26 years ±1.71) was selected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A Brazilian study to assess the craniofacial morphology of HIV-infected children on ART (study group) showed no significant differences compared with matched non-HIV-infected children (control group) in the ages of 6-17 years. Increased maxillary rotation in the 6-8 year age group and reduced SNA (sella, nasion, A point) angle in the 13-17 year age group were the only significant values in the study group [ 43 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%