2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/9344028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Craniofacial Morphology of Orthodontic Patients with and without Temporomandibular Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract: Purpose. We aimed to explore the relationship between temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) and craniofacial morphology in orthodontic patients. Methods. Altogether, 262 orthodontic patients were included and divided into two groups according to their Fonseca Anamnestic Index (FAI) scores: a no-TMD group (control group, FAI < 20) and a TMD group (FAI ≥ 20). Cephalometric parameters including cranial, maxillary, mandibular, and dental parameters were traced on cephalograms. Craniofacial morphology was compared … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, the craniofacial morphology of TMD and has been well-investigated ( 16 ) and it is reported that patients with TMD exhibit specific craniofacial features compared to patients without TMD ( 16 , 17 ). Our previous study ( 14 ) also validated the results and further observed a significant difference in Frankfort-mandibular plane angle (FMA) between patients with and without TMDs. Besides, we found there existed specific craniofacial features between TMD patients with and without TMJ pain as well ( 14 ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, the craniofacial morphology of TMD and has been well-investigated ( 16 ) and it is reported that patients with TMD exhibit specific craniofacial features compared to patients without TMD ( 16 , 17 ). Our previous study ( 14 ) also validated the results and further observed a significant difference in Frankfort-mandibular plane angle (FMA) between patients with and without TMDs. Besides, we found there existed specific craniofacial features between TMD patients with and without TMJ pain as well ( 14 ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Lateral cephalometric radiograph, an easily accessible and non-invasive examination, can supply abundant data concerning the cranial, facial bony and soft tissue structures. For its economy and convenience, lateral cephalometric radiograph has been not only widely used as facial analysis before and after orthodontic treatment, but also utilized to explore the association between TMD including its symptoms and the characteristics of craniofacial morphology ( 14 17 ). Already in 1995, lateral cephalometry was applied to investigate the association between morphologic features and internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint ( 15 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have examined the effects of conservative therapies, such as oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, orthodontics, electrotherapy, physical therapy, occlusal splints, oxygen-ozone therapy, and extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) in patients affected by TMD [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Among them, ESWT has been demonstrated to be effective in reducing pain and improving the function of the stomatognathic system; however, this treatment is relatively slow in relieving pain for patients and needs additional functional therapy to preserve the long-term therapeutic result [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clinical practice, symptoms of TMDs have become recurring complaints among orthodontic patients [ 15 ], and a higher prevalence of TMDs has been observed in orthodontic patients than in the general population [ 16 , 17 ]. Malocclusion, as well as psychological distress following appearance unsatisfaction, may be potential risk factors for TMDs [ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%