2016
DOI: 10.13110/humanbiology.88.1.0015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Craniofacial Secular Change in Recent Mexican Migrants

Abstract: Research by economists suggests that recent Mexican migrants are better educated and have higher socio-economic status (SES) than previous migrants. Because factors associated with higher SES and improved education can lead to positive secular changes in overall body form, secular changes in the craniofacial complex were analyzed within a recent migrant group from Mexico. The Mexican group represents individuals in the act of migration, not yet influenced by the American environment and as such can serve as a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Jantz (2001) found that 30–50% of cranial variation can be explained by an individual's birth year alone. A more recent study by Spradley et al (2016) found both positive and negative secular changes in craniometric measurements of modern Hispanic migrants in comparison with historic migrants, leading to a relative change in cranial shape. Furthermore, Spradley et al (2016) found that more variables were affected in males than females.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Jantz (2001) found that 30–50% of cranial variation can be explained by an individual's birth year alone. A more recent study by Spradley et al (2016) found both positive and negative secular changes in craniometric measurements of modern Hispanic migrants in comparison with historic migrants, leading to a relative change in cranial shape. Furthermore, Spradley et al (2016) found that more variables were affected in males than females.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Secular change has been extensively explored over the past two decades and has been shown to impact stature, cranial dimensions, and pelvic morphology (Jantz, 2001; Jantz & Meadows Jantz, 2000, 2016; Klales, 2016; Meadows & Jantz, 1995; Meadows Jantz & Jantz, 1999; Spradley, Stull, & Hefner, 2016; Vitek, 2012), although population changes in skull proportions were first documented as early as the 1900s by Boas (1912). Evidence in support of secular change has been detailed in several studies focused on craniometrics and postcranial morphometrics and nonmetrics; however, to date, few researchers have addressed the potential of temporal changes occurring in the expression of cranial and mandibular morphological traits, especially within a contemporary context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of craniometric variability among the most diverse populations is well established in the scientiic literature [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] , and the development of analytical standards speciic to each geographic location is of paramount importance. The factors associated with changes in the shape and size of the skull can be categorized as intrinsic (genetic factors) or extrinsic (factors related to environment) factors 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A existência da variabilidade craniométrica entre as mais variadas populações está bem estabelecida na literatura científica [26][27][28]31,[75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86] , e é de suma importância o desenvolvimento de padrões analíticos específicos para cada localização geográfica.…”
Section: Variabilidade Craniométria E a Antropologia Forenseunclassified
“…A amostra brasileira é considerada uma amostra contemporânea ou moderna, os crânios e mandíbulas pertencentes a esta coleção são originários do século XX. Considerando a plasticidade do crânio ao longo do tempo, ocasionando uma diminuição das medidas cranianas 86 , uma redução da largura facial apresentando faces mais estreitas e alongadas 75,109,110 , assim como a mandíbula 82 117,119,120 .…”
Section: Ramsthaler Et Al 2010 50 31 19unclassified