1974
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.37.12.1291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Craniopagus twins

Abstract: SYNOPSIS Craniopagus twins are described. At the age of 24 years, the twins appeared to have adapted well to their disability. The site of union, their relatively advanced age, and the high risk of operation were the reasons for not proposing surgical separation. Perceptive upbringing and adaptation to the disability may be alternatives to the neurosurgical management of this birth defect.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, humans affected by either congenital or acquired conditions where portions of the brain are severely underdeveloped or missing can have normal or near-normal intelligence and cognitive skills, with examples including some severe forms of microcephaly (Haslam and Smith, 1979; Kozma et al, 1996); childhood hemispherectomy (i.e., disconnection or removal of an entire cerebral hemisphere; Borgstein and Grootendorst, 2002; Devlin et al, 2003; Liégeois et al, 2010; Pulsifer et al, 2004); a patient born with only one hemisphere (Muckli et al, 2009); craniopagus malformation (Lansdell, 1999; Stone and Goodrich, 2006; Todorov et al, 1974), including a pair of craniopagus twins that share a brain and mind (Squair, 2012); individuals with almost complete absence of the cerebellum (Glickstein, 1994; Yu et al, 2015); and a case of severe hydrocephaly (Feuillet et al, 2007). Nevertheless, how a simple change in brain size or neuron and/or glia number could lead to differences in cognitive capabilities is not, at a mechanistic level, well understood.…”
Section: Evolutionary Perspective On Human Nervous System Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, humans affected by either congenital or acquired conditions where portions of the brain are severely underdeveloped or missing can have normal or near-normal intelligence and cognitive skills, with examples including some severe forms of microcephaly (Haslam and Smith, 1979; Kozma et al, 1996); childhood hemispherectomy (i.e., disconnection or removal of an entire cerebral hemisphere; Borgstein and Grootendorst, 2002; Devlin et al, 2003; Liégeois et al, 2010; Pulsifer et al, 2004); a patient born with only one hemisphere (Muckli et al, 2009); craniopagus malformation (Lansdell, 1999; Stone and Goodrich, 2006; Todorov et al, 1974), including a pair of craniopagus twins that share a brain and mind (Squair, 2012); individuals with almost complete absence of the cerebellum (Glickstein, 1994; Yu et al, 2015); and a case of severe hydrocephaly (Feuillet et al, 2007). Nevertheless, how a simple change in brain size or neuron and/or glia number could lead to differences in cognitive capabilities is not, at a mechanistic level, well understood.…”
Section: Evolutionary Perspective On Human Nervous System Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of Todorov et al (1974) of 14 examples of crainiopagus emphasizes the low male: female sex ratio (3: 11) that would be expected from their formation in this way.…”
Section: Monstersmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Detailed reports of the condition of such surviving twins are rarely published. A recent one (Todorov et al, 1974) described 24 year old craniopagus twins (type I). These showed gross intellectual retardation and education was virtually impossible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%