2018
DOI: 10.1080/19439962.2018.1505793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crash severity analysis of rear-end crashes in California using statistical and machine learning classification methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These drivers tend to be more aware of the danger and are better prepared to slow down or take other measures to reduce the crash risk. These findings are consistent with a number of previous researches [31,[38][39][40][41]. However, Zhao and Garber found no major differences between the day and nighttime crashes in the work zone [42].…”
Section: Model Estimation Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These drivers tend to be more aware of the danger and are better prepared to slow down or take other measures to reduce the crash risk. These findings are consistent with a number of previous researches [31,[38][39][40][41]. However, Zhao and Garber found no major differences between the day and nighttime crashes in the work zone [42].…”
Section: Model Estimation Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This finding is deemed to be reasonable for the unique attitude of male drivers to take more risks, drive over the speed-limit, and drive more aggressively. Accordingly, a number of previous studies [16,30,31] are in agreement with these findings. However, some studies [32,33] have argued this aspect, while claiming that similar circumstances tend to affect female drivers more than male drivers .…”
Section: Model Estimation Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Back-Propagation Neural Network (BPNN) had all been widely and successfully used in predicting the possibility of injury-severity outcome [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. Choosing a suitable method for the crash prediction is critical.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study modeled and compared crash severity using the MNL, mixed multinomial logit (MMNL), and SVM models using rear-end crash data for California. The study found that SVM outperformed other models in terms of prediction accuracy [22]. Singh et al [23] modeled the traffic crash severity using MNL and two non-parametric techniques -RF and DTfor a dataset in Haryana, India.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%