2012
DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2011.648518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crashworthiness optimisation of vehicle structures with magnesium alloy parts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these techniques, Polynomial Response Surface (PRS) [2], Radial Basis Function (RBF) [6,7,42], and Kriging (KG) [45] are of importance. Based on the prior experience with RBF and its ability for accurate representation of nonlinear responses [6,7,42], this technique was selected for response approximation in this study.…”
Section: Response Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these techniques, Polynomial Response Surface (PRS) [2], Radial Basis Function (RBF) [6,7,42], and Kriging (KG) [45] are of importance. Based on the prior experience with RBF and its ability for accurate representation of nonlinear responses [6,7,42], this technique was selected for response approximation in this study.…”
Section: Response Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the use of lightweight magnesium alloy panels into automotive industry, until now only Andrew Parrish, Masoud Rais-Rohani and Ali Najafi [1,8] have replaced the baseline steel parts and performed optimization on the full-scale Dodge Neon model on crashworthiness characteristics. But there is no refer to material mechanism of magnesium alloys, especially dynamic mechanism for nonlinear characteristics such as in this crashworthiness.…”
Section: Structural Panel Use Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stricter regulations on fuel economy and growing concerns on automotive emissions have led to an increased focus on vehicle weight reduction [1]. Automotive lightweight is considered as key strategy to improve fuel consumption and reduce artificial environmental damage emissions [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using virtual test to optimise a B-Pillar by changing the B-Pillar material and thickness, Qiao and Shi [5] found out that increasing the material thickness was not an ideal approach but changing the material from steel to aluminium alloy greatly improved the crashworthiness of the B-Pillar. However, studies conducted by Parrish et al [32] revealed that magnesium alloy can be optimised to improve crashworthiness characteristics with over 50% weight reduction in the redesign part. Contrarily, Lilehkoohi et al [33] in their investigation proposed AISI1006 carbon steel for B-Pillar crash impact test but this may compromise the lightweight requirement due to its density which may contribute to fuel consumption rate of a given vehicle.…”
Section: Elastic Region and Ultimate Tensile Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%