2020
DOI: 10.1111/ppl.13312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crassulacean acid metabolism species differ in the contribution of C3 and C4 carboxylation to end of day CO2 fixation

Abstract: Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) is a photosynthetic pathway that temporally separates the nocturnal CO 2 uptake, via phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC, C 4 carboxylation), from the diurnal refixation by Rubisco (C 3 carboxylation). At the end of the day (CAM-Phase IV), when nocturnally stored CO 2 has depleted, stomata reopen and allow additional CO 2 uptake, which can be fixed by Rubisco or by PEPC. This work examined the CO 2 uptake via C 3 and C 4 carboxylation in phase IV in the CAM species Phalaeno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the observed reduction of tissue acidity during the dry season is more likely to occur because of higher nocturnal temperatures than during the rainy season (Nobel et al 1991, Cervera et al 2007, Andrade et al 2009). Additionally, increased light incidence without a proportional increase in the malate supply would predispose this epiphytic species to photoinhibition, which, along with drought stress, would increase the negative effects of the high radiation (Skillman & Winter 1997, van Tongerlo et al 2021. In fact, studies show that stress caused by drought or extreme temperatures increases the risk and severity of photoinhibition in plants in arid regions and in tropical epiphytes (Athar & Ashraf 2005, Hasanuzzaman et al 2013, Chaves et al 2018, Arroyo-Pérez et al 2017.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the observed reduction of tissue acidity during the dry season is more likely to occur because of higher nocturnal temperatures than during the rainy season (Nobel et al 1991, Cervera et al 2007, Andrade et al 2009). Additionally, increased light incidence without a proportional increase in the malate supply would predispose this epiphytic species to photoinhibition, which, along with drought stress, would increase the negative effects of the high radiation (Skillman & Winter 1997, van Tongerlo et al 2021. In fact, studies show that stress caused by drought or extreme temperatures increases the risk and severity of photoinhibition in plants in arid regions and in tropical epiphytes (Athar & Ashraf 2005, Hasanuzzaman et al 2013, Chaves et al 2018, Arroyo-Pérez et al 2017.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the CO 2 uptake of control with a trend of increase (not significant) by weekly −0.5 MPa solution replacements, plants under MWS treatment exhibited relatively stable carbon assimilation after a 5-week incubation, despite a calculated peak on week 2. There was a significant decrease in the relative INCU in IWS after 5 weeks of incubation, with 46.03% (t(2) = 1.69, P upper-tailed = 0.1167), 59.92% (t(2) = 1.5, P upper-tailed = 0.1357), 39.34% (t(2) = 6.56, P upper-tailed = 0.0112), and 32.27% (t(2) = 16.18, P upper-tailed = 0.019) from weeks 2 to 5 compared to week 1, respectively.…”
Section: Relative Integrated Net Co 2 Uptake After Water Stress Appli...mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The detected CO 2 values from each vessel were recorded every 30 s for 5 consecutive weeks. The CAM photosynthesis phases were shifted after signs of three successive positive/negative Pn [58,59].…”
Section: Dynamic Photosynthesis Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the day, stomata are closed to prevent water loss via transpiration, malate is transported out of the vacuoles and converted back to CO 2 in chloroplasts, where it is fixed by RuBisCO. This temporal separation suppresses O 2 fixation and photorespiration by limiting O 2 diffusion through closed stomata when RuBisCO is active (van Tongerlo et al, 2020). Unlike C 4 carbon fixation, CAM can be an inducible phenotype in C 3 plants (Schiller & Bräutigam, 2021) as the enzymes in C 3 and CAM plants are identical and differ mainly in temporal regulation.…”
Section: Co2 Concentrating Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%