2008
DOI: 10.1300/j029v17n02_07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Craving Among Polysubstance Using Adolescents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Novelty Seeking (NS), Harm Avoidance (HA), and Reward Dependence (RD) were assessed with the Junior Temperament and Character Inventory (Luby, Svrakic, McCallum, Przybeck, & Cloninger, 1999). Previous research indicates that some of these personality variables are predictive of drug use, including P (Conner et al, 2005;Sáiz et al, 2003), E (Merenäkk et al, 2003), and N (Florsheim et al, 2007). Research also supports predictive relationships between NS (Cloninger, Sigvardsson, & Bohman, 1988;Mâsse & Tremblay, 1997), HA (Cloninger et al, 1988;Tcheremissine, Lane, Cherek, & Pietras, 2003), and RD (Tcheremissine et al, 2003) and drug use in adolescence.…”
Section: Personalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Novelty Seeking (NS), Harm Avoidance (HA), and Reward Dependence (RD) were assessed with the Junior Temperament and Character Inventory (Luby, Svrakic, McCallum, Przybeck, & Cloninger, 1999). Previous research indicates that some of these personality variables are predictive of drug use, including P (Conner et al, 2005;Sáiz et al, 2003), E (Merenäkk et al, 2003), and N (Florsheim et al, 2007). Research also supports predictive relationships between NS (Cloninger, Sigvardsson, & Bohman, 1988;Mâsse & Tremblay, 1997), HA (Cloninger et al, 1988;Tcheremissine, Lane, Cherek, & Pietras, 2003), and RD (Tcheremissine et al, 2003) and drug use in adolescence.…”
Section: Personalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a clinical perspective, it is useful to know that some craving assessments have been developed with samples of drug users who were not seeking treatment 22 or with samples restricted to inpatients 54 . Further, with only a few exceptions, 55 most instruments have been developed with adults. Craving instruments might be somewhat invariant across variations in contexts or groups of users, but there has been little systematic research on this issue.…”
Section: Craving Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two major methodological developments have had a major impact on modem craving research. First, the measurement of self-reported craving has advanced considerably over the past 20 years with the development of multiitem questionnaires that are highly reliable and very sensitive to fluctuations in craving over time (e.g., Florsheim et al, 2007;Heishman, Singelton, & Liguori, 2001;Tiffany & Drobes, 1991;Tiffany, Fields, Singleton, Haertzen, & Henningfield, 1995;Tiffany, Singleton, Haertzen, & Henningfield, 1993). The items on these questionnaires typically include ratings of statements of desire for a specific drug (e.g., "I have an urge for cocaine") but may cover other semantic content, including statements of intent and plans to use (e.g., "I will smoke as soon as possible"), anticipation of specific outcomes from drug use (e.g., "I would feel less depressed if I could drink now"), and difficulty controlling use (e.g., "It would be difficult to turn down a joint right this minute").…”
Section: Measurement and Manipulation Of Cravingmentioning
confidence: 99%