2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40200-020-00547-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CREATE (Community deRivEd AutomaTEd insulin delivery) trial. Randomised parallel arm open label clinical trial comparing automated insulin delivery using a mobile controller (AnyDANA-loop) with an open-source algorithm with sensor augmented pump therapy in type 1 diabetes

Abstract: Background Commercialised automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have demonstrated improved outcomes in type 1 diabetes (T1D), however, they have limited capacity for algorithm individualisation, and can be prohibitively expensive if an individual is without access to health insurance or health funding subsidy. Freely available open-source algorithms, which have the ability to individualise algorithm parameters paired with commercial insulin pumps, and continuous glucose monitoring make up the so-called "do … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 Open-source algorithms for closed loop or automated insulin delivery (AID) predate commercial availability of such systems and have been developed by members of the diabetes community. [10][11][12][13] The three most common systems include OpenAPS, Loop, and AndroidAPS. 14,15 Each has an emphasis on safety but are unregulated, as they are user-designed and user-driven.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 Open-source algorithms for closed loop or automated insulin delivery (AID) predate commercial availability of such systems and have been developed by members of the diabetes community. [10][11][12][13] The three most common systems include OpenAPS, Loop, and AndroidAPS. 14,15 Each has an emphasis on safety but are unregulated, as they are user-designed and user-driven.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,17,18 Work is just beginning on randomized controlled trials analyzing these systems in hybrid closed loop mode (where users are typically announcing meals); there are currently no head-to-head studies comparing automated insulin delivery system performance without meal announcement. 13 In developing these algorithms further for use without meal announcements, it is important to understand the performance of each in clinical practice. In this study, we evaluate the algorithms used in OpenAPS/AndroidAPS and Loop, without meal announcements or user interactions, in a pig model of insulin-deficient diabetes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He showed a significant reduction of HbA1c, better fasting blood glucose and less hypo or hyperglycemia during the daytime before the meals and after the boluses and reduction of totally daily insulin dose in adults patients using AndroidAPS 39 . Another open‐labeled randomized control study comparing SAP and AndroidAPS DANA pump (the CREATE trial) is running in New Zealand 40 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 Another open-labeled randomized control study comparing SAP and AndroidAPS DANA pump (the CREATE trial) is running in New Zealand. 40 The prospective RCT should be finished to eliminate safety concern with DIY closed loop systems. Our participants did not report any episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycemia during the whole 346 patient-month period of AndroidAPS.…”
Section: Devices/systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 They have been studied not only in retrospective and observational studies 11,12 but also in silico 13 as well as ongoing, randomized control trials. 14…”
Section: “How It Started” For Artificial Pancreas Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%