2007
DOI: 10.4159/9780674044036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating a Class

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The movement for test-optional evaluation protocols (8,9) has gained more momentum in light of the public health risks associated with in-person administration of the SAT and other standardized tests used in college admissions during the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic. To the extent that the elimination of standardized tests recalibrates the relative weight of other application materials, the basic terms of holistic review-the current standard of best practice for jointly considering standardized tests alongside qualitative components of applications (10)(11)(12)-require fresh scrutiny. The May 2021 decision by the University of California, a university system serving nearly 300,000 students that is a bellwether for national trends in higher education, to no longer consider standardized test scores compels a thorough reconsideration of the remaining components of admission files and how they relate to applicant characteristics such as socioeconomic status.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The movement for test-optional evaluation protocols (8,9) has gained more momentum in light of the public health risks associated with in-person administration of the SAT and other standardized tests used in college admissions during the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic. To the extent that the elimination of standardized tests recalibrates the relative weight of other application materials, the basic terms of holistic review-the current standard of best practice for jointly considering standardized tests alongside qualitative components of applications (10)(11)(12)-require fresh scrutiny. The May 2021 decision by the University of California, a university system serving nearly 300,000 students that is a bellwether for national trends in higher education, to no longer consider standardized test scores compels a thorough reconsideration of the remaining components of admission files and how they relate to applicant characteristics such as socioeconomic status.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our students/coresearchers and focus group participants had constructed a particular type of student that they would describe as 'typical' for the university (middle-upper class, white, non-disabled). Messages conveyed through the hidden curriculum often translate into perceptions of an 'implied' or 'ideal' higher education student (Stevens 2007;Chiu 2018, 2019;Ulriksen 2009), i.e., the projection of the student who is likely to thrive within a particular institutional culture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This focus on the students has often given rise to concepts of an 'ideal' Chiu 2018, 2019) or 'implied' (Stevens 2007) student. Although such concepts are intended to support better understanding of success, difficulties and dropout rates (or act as 'a thinking tool to better understand the expectations and experiences of university students', Wong and Chiu 2019, 9), they can also reinforce preconceptions that can be unhelpful to students who do not (or perceive themselves not to) meet assumed expectations, for example, because of where they were born, the conditions of their lives, having a disability, identifying as members of a minority group etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While all groups possess valuable forms of capital (Carter, 2003;Yosso, 2005), it is the dominant group, and the capital it holds, that stands to be most rewarded by the education system and beyond. Unlike dominant groups who can readily dispense dominant resources (social, economic, and cultural) into grooming their children to pursue particular majors and attend particular colleges (see Lareau, 2003;Stevens, 2007), non-dominant students and families tend to rely primarily upon schools to provide the range of dominant capitals necessary for social mobility. However, despite a strong desire to increase opportunities for students, many non-dominant schools struggle to provide the dominant capitals they promise.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Access To Stem Education As "Shadow Capital"mentioning
confidence: 99%