1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf00993505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating a memory of causal relationships, by Michael Pazzani, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1990

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

27
1,672
4
44

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,337 publications
(1,747 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
27
1,672
4
44
Order By: Relevance
“…On the family unit subscale of the Social Adjustment Scale–Self Report (data not displayed), there was a significant treatment advantage for interpersonal psychotherapy (χ 2 =3.93, df=1, p=.05). Covariate-adjusted effect sizes ranged from small to large, based on Cohen’s (33) guidelines, and all showed an advantage for interpersonal psychotherapy over usual care at 36 weeks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the family unit subscale of the Social Adjustment Scale–Self Report (data not displayed), there was a significant treatment advantage for interpersonal psychotherapy (χ 2 =3.93, df=1, p=.05). Covariate-adjusted effect sizes ranged from small to large, based on Cohen’s (33) guidelines, and all showed an advantage for interpersonal psychotherapy over usual care at 36 weeks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, Spearman's rank correlation with histology was also calculated for all methods, and values from 0.51 to 0.58 were found. According to Cohen,27 values between 0.30 and 0.50 are considered as a moderate correlation and values from 0.50 to 1.0 as strong. Because the values are in the lower border of this interval, they should be carefully interpreted as strong.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we tested associations between weight teasing, physical activity and self-efficacy by computing zero-order correlations using Pearson correlations. Sizes of correlation effects were interpreted according to Cohen [37], defining r ≥ 0.10 as small, r ≥ 0.30 as medium and r ≥ 0.50 as large effects. Second, independent t tests were conducted in order to compare means of overweight and normal-weight participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%