2020 IEEE 33rd International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/cbms49503.2020.00053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating a Metamodel Based on Machine Learning to Identify the Sentiment of Vaccine and Disease-Related Messages in Twitter: the MAVIS Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a manual validation of the three systems independently showed a barely reasonable accuracy, the reality is that none of the systems separately provides sufficiently accuracy to consider the use of the system to identify the sentiment expressed. The results from 43 showed that the use of commercial tools independently did not provide enough accuracy in the identification of the tweets individually. The agreement level between both tools and evaluators was quite uneven, as it can be seen in.…”
Section: General Methodologymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although a manual validation of the three systems independently showed a barely reasonable accuracy, the reality is that none of the systems separately provides sufficiently accuracy to consider the use of the system to identify the sentiment expressed. The results from 43 showed that the use of commercial tools independently did not provide enough accuracy in the identification of the tweets individually. The agreement level between both tools and evaluators was quite uneven, as it can be seen in.…”
Section: General Methodologymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For this reason, the paper will not dig into the technical details about the tweet sentiment identification, which has been already described with anteriority. 43 …”
Section: General Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation