Creating a More Inclusive Future for Scholarly Communications: ACRL’s New Research Agenda for Scholarly Communications and the Research Environment

Maron, Nancy; Kennison, Rebecca; Hall, Nathan; Shorish, Yasmeen; Malenfant, Kara

doi:10.4000/proceedings.elpub.2019.6

Cited by 3 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Relativamente aos direitos autorais, incluem-se aqui as possibilidades de uso de materiais protegidos de terceiros de acordo com as limitações e exceções vigentes e informações sobre conteúdos licenciados abertamente, aqui incluindose também as licenças Creative Commons, a retenção de direitos no momento da submissão de um artigo para publicação em um periódico, a disseminação de práticas de uso justo (fair use) e as questões relativas à conduta ética em pesquisa, envolvendo também a questão do plágio (Leonard & Bennett, 2013;Fruin, 2017;Maron et al, 2019;Schmidt & Boczar, 2021).…”

Section: Escritório De Comunicação Científicaunclassified

O escritório de comunicação científica como perspectiva de atuação para bibliotecas universitárias

Silva

Guimarães

2023

Ibersid

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Teniendo en cuenta los actuales desafíos que enfrentan las universidades, como la obligación de rendir cuentas a la sociedad, la necesidad de una mayor visibilidad científica, la alta competencia a través de los rankings internacionales y el avance de las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación, se analiza la figura de la oficina de comunicación científica en el ámbito de la biblioteca universitaria. Para ello, se parte de los modelos de comunicación científica existentes para llegar a productos y servicios de una oficina de comunicación científica a través del análisis de una muestra de quince oficinas de comunicación científica existentes en bibliotecas de universidades consideradas de excelencia en cuatro rankings universitarios internacionales. Los resultados evidencian, en diferentes etapas de desarrollo, actividades relacionadas con el acceso abierto, los derechos de autor, la gestión de datos de investigación, los identificadores de autor, el impacto de la investigación, las métricas, la publicación y los repositorios. Se concluye que la identificación y sistematización de las iniciativas relacionadas con los servicios de apoyo a la comunicación científica ubicados en las bibliotecas con el fin de estructurar oficinas de este tipo, a partir de la realidad estudiada, llevan a pensar en la necesidad de que la formación del bibliotecario contemple una sólida base en comunicación científica (y con una fuerte base en la sociología de la ciencia), no solo desde un punto de vista normativo, sino a partir de una experiencia investigativa efectiva que permita al bibliotecario ponerse en la posición del investigador y, de esta manera, tener claridad sobre los aspectos que requieren su apoyo.

show abstract

Section: Escritório De Comunicação Científicaunclassified

O escritório de comunicação científica como perspectiva de atuação para bibliotecas universitárias

Silva

Guimarães

2023

Ibersid

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For this study, dictionaries and Google Scholar were used to explore the published definitions of the four terms and contexts in which these terms were defined. Open-sourced databases were used to support a more equitable, inclusive, and transparent system of scholarship, providing future researchers with easy access to the findings of the study and easy replication of the study (Maron, Kennison, Hall, Shorish, & Malenfant, 2019).…”

Section: Phase 1: Literature Review Of the Four Termsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Google search was used for each of the terms to determine their industry and marketing usage. Again, the authors used open-sourced databases to support a more equitable, inclusive, and transparent system of scholarship for easy access to the study’s outcomes and transferability of the study processes (Maron et al, 2019).…”

Section: Phase 2: Survey Of Four Terms Used In Marketplacesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Words Matter: A Content Analysis of the Definitions and Usage of the Terms for Apparel Marketed to People Living With Disabilities

McBee-Black

Ha‐Brookshire

2019

Clothing and Textiles Research Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to gain a baseline understanding of the terms currently used to define apparel for people living with disability (PLWD) and to encourage discussion for satisfying the apparel needs and wants of PLWD. The objectives were to conduct a literature review of the terms—adaptive, functional, universal design, and inclusive design—to survey how these terms are used in the marketplace, and to compare their usage to that in the literature. The results of a content analysis showed that adaptive is the most popular term used in the marketplace, yet, according to the literature review, reflects a medical model of disability. The term functional reflects a utilitarian purpose in the literature, with minimal application for PLWD in the marketplace. The terms universal and inclusive design are rarely used to define apparel for PLWD in the marketplace despite the heavy focus in the literature.

show abstract

“…2018), supported by the Mellon Foundation, and the ACRL report on Open and Equitable Scholarly Communications (Maron et al. 2019) have drawn attention to the need to measure and integrate equity and inclusion into the scholarly ecosystem. There is convincing evidence, based on point‐in‐time studies, that scholarly processes and outputs have substantial bias and/or create barriers to inclusion (Lee et al.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To make reliable progress toward a socially-desirable scholarly ecosystem the research community requires ongoing, systematic, and trusted measures of inclusivity, equity, durability, and sustainability. Environmental scans such as the Grand Challenges Summit (Altman et al 2018), supported by the Mellon Foundation, and the ACRL report on Open and Equitable Scholarly Communications (Maron et al 2019) have drawn attention to the need to measure and integrate equity and inclusion into the scholarly ecosystem. There is convincing evidence, based on point-in-time studies, that scholarly processes and outputs have substantial bias and/or create barriers to inclusion (Lee et al 2013) and that more openness in science and scholarly communication is needed.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Designing Community Tracking Indicators for Open and Inclusive Scholarship

Altman

2022

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is evidence that scholarly processes have bias and create barriers to inclusion; more openness in scholarly communication is needed. Progress towards a better scholarly ecosystem requires comparable, reliable measures of the desired attributes of a better system. This paper describes an initiative in progress to produce standardized indicators that describe the volume and types of open science output systematically over time, using existing open data sources. We describe a replicable to clean, integrate, code, and analyze these sources to enable continuous publication of indicators. And we report on early results from this initiative, demonstrating how these indicators can go beyond “overall impact” measures to advance the understanding of who is, and who is not, participating in open scholarship.

show abstract

Creating a More Inclusive Future for Scholarly Communications: ACRL’s New Research Agenda for Scholarly Communications and the Research Environment

Cited by 3 publications

References 6 publications

O escritório de comunicação científica como perspectiva de atuação para bibliotecas universitárias

O escritório de comunicação científica como perspectiva de atuação para bibliotecas universitárias

Words Matter: A Content Analysis of the Definitions and Usage of the Terms for Apparel Marketed to People Living With Disabilities

Designing Community Tracking Indicators for Open and Inclusive Scholarship

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About