2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2011.00815.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating a national register of childhood type 1 diabetes using routinely collected hospital data

Abstract: ABSTRACT:Introduction: There is no national register of childhood type 1 diabetes mellitus for England. Our

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only five conditions were investigated in more than one study: diabetes (10.6%) [13-16], inflammatory bowel disease (5.4%) [17,18], asthma (5.4%) [19,20], rotavirus infection (5.4%) [21,22], and tuberculosis (5.4%) [23,24]. However, a diverse range of conditions were investigated in single studies, including obesity [25], vaccine-related illness [26], injuries [27], autism [28], febrile neutropenia in oncology patients [29], high risk conditions [30], dermatologic conditions [31-33], congenital anomalies [34], cardiac defects [35], respiratory illnesses excluding asthma [36-38], neurologic conditions [39], other gastrointestinal conditions [40-43], genitourinary conditions [44,45], serum sickness [46], thrombosis [47], maternal/perinatal conditions [48], and drug-related anaphylaxis [49].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only five conditions were investigated in more than one study: diabetes (10.6%) [13-16], inflammatory bowel disease (5.4%) [17,18], asthma (5.4%) [19,20], rotavirus infection (5.4%) [21,22], and tuberculosis (5.4%) [23,24]. However, a diverse range of conditions were investigated in single studies, including obesity [25], vaccine-related illness [26], injuries [27], autism [28], febrile neutropenia in oncology patients [29], high risk conditions [30], dermatologic conditions [31-33], congenital anomalies [34], cardiac defects [35], respiratory illnesses excluding asthma [36-38], neurologic conditions [39], other gastrointestinal conditions [40-43], genitourinary conditions [44,45], serum sickness [46], thrombosis [47], maternal/perinatal conditions [48], and drug-related anaphylaxis [49].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As highlighted by a study of Hodgson et al in the UK, despite the fact that HDR represents a useful instrument in exploring the epidemiology of diabetes, it is crucial to establish dedicated diabetes registries. A diabetes registry could incorporate additional data for undertaking etiological research into this important childhood condition [ 38 ]. Although the Apulian RCOD has shown a level of clinical documentation completeness >90%, a sensitivity of 39% is still low to ensure reliable epidemiological data, firstly because of the limited number of physicians involved in the activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…children treated outside the NHS setting. We have shown previously that HES-based data show good concordance with well-ascertained regional register data, especially from the year 2000 onwards, and for children aged 0-9 years [14], which influenced our choice of time period and age groups for this study. Type 1 diabetes is a heterogeneous disease [1,49], and environmental triggers may differ in those with early onset vs those who present with diabetes at an older age.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…We identified all inpatient admissions for children aged 0-9 years with a primary diagnosis of type 1 or type unknown diabetes (ICD-9 codes: 250X1, 250X3, 250X, 250X9 [www. icd9data.com/2007/Volume1]; ICD-10 codes: E10X, E12X, E13X, E14X [http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/ browse/2016/en]) admitted between 1 January 1992 and 31 March 2011, to create a dataset of incident diabetes during the period 1 April 2000 to 31 March 2011 based on first admission for each unique patient [14]. Readmissions were excluded on the basis of the unique patient identifier (HES-ID) and for those with missing HES-ID (predominantly affecting admissions prior to 1997), from unique combinations of date of birth, sex and pseudonymised postcode.…”
Section: Health Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation