2020
DOI: 10.24251/hicss.2020.474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating a Standardized Risk Assessment Framework Library for Healthcare Information Technology

Abstract: Data breaches are occurring at an unprecedented rate.In February 2019 alone, over a million individuals were reported to the United States government as having been involved in a breach of their medical data by healthcare entities. Although many organizations have some policies, procedures and risk management components in place, few (if any) organizations are centrally connecting legal requirements, penetration tests, policies and procedures into a standardized and consistent methodology for further analysis … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The healthcare industry has moved to a risk management model, perhaps due to the Federal requirement of risk assessments for systems and processes involving PHI. Currently the healthcare industry has not yet adopted a standard risk framework library (Schmeelk, 2020). The adoption of such a framework would help unify associated breach cost estimates for insurance purposes and improve ad hoc risks assessments from reporting entirely different findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The healthcare industry has moved to a risk management model, perhaps due to the Federal requirement of risk assessments for systems and processes involving PHI. Currently the healthcare industry has not yet adopted a standard risk framework library (Schmeelk, 2020). The adoption of such a framework would help unify associated breach cost estimates for insurance purposes and improve ad hoc risks assessments from reporting entirely different findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%