2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2017.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating an engaging and stimulating anatomy lecture environment using the Cognitive Load Theory-based Lecture Model: Students' experiences

Abstract: Objective There is a need to create a standard interactive anatomy lecture that can engage students in their learning process. This study investigated the impact of a new lecturing guideline, the Cognitive Load Theory-based Lecture Model (CLT-bLM), on students' cognitive engagement and motivation. Methods A randomised controlled trial involving 197 participants from three institutions was conducted. The control group attended a freestyle lecture on the gross anatomy of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a pillar of medical education, teaching and learning in anatomy must withstand and adapt to changes in the ecosystem of medical training (Estai and Bunt, 2016). Within the past two decades, the literature on anatomy education has documented various forms of technology-enhanced and educational theory-based teaching innovations to either replace or supplement traditional teaching methods (i.e., cadaveric dissections, didactic lectures, and demonstration) (Krych et al, 2005;Finn and McLachlan, 2010;McMenamin et al, 2014;Webb and Choi, 2014;Hadie et al, 2018a). Many factors underpinned the changes in teaching methods for anatomy, which emerged since 1979 after a revamp in the medical curriculum in Malaysia (Lim, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a pillar of medical education, teaching and learning in anatomy must withstand and adapt to changes in the ecosystem of medical training (Estai and Bunt, 2016). Within the past two decades, the literature on anatomy education has documented various forms of technology-enhanced and educational theory-based teaching innovations to either replace or supplement traditional teaching methods (i.e., cadaveric dissections, didactic lectures, and demonstration) (Krych et al, 2005;Finn and McLachlan, 2010;McMenamin et al, 2014;Webb and Choi, 2014;Hadie et al, 2018a). Many factors underpinned the changes in teaching methods for anatomy, which emerged since 1979 after a revamp in the medical curriculum in Malaysia (Lim, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches are self-monitoring to specify when insufficient understanding is present, asking elucidating questions, maintaining various representations in the working memory for compare and contrast, and previous knowledge activation on the disease or the patient which is an applied strategy to optimize germane load [ Table 3 ]. [ 4 8 9 11 12 15 19 20 22 30 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This topic was selected because content experts have rated it as one of the most difficult anatomy topics 35 . The lecture materials were prepared using the PowerPoint software by a qualified anatomist who utilised the lecturing strategies of the Cognitive Load Theory-based Lecture Model (CLT-bLM19, 21). This effort was crucial to ensure efficient delivery of the difficult topic through the elimination of extraneous distraction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than being seen as an implicit “spoon-feeding” style of teaching, modern lecturers in medical education aim to provide some prior knowledge to the students to prepare them for subsequent knowledge integration and application in a more student-centred learning environment 20 . However, teaching a difficult and content-driven subject through lectures can undoubtedly impose cognitive overload on students if the lectures are not prepared well19, 21; thus, it is pertinent to find a way of designing an interactive lecture session 21, 22. There are many published guidelines on producing engaging and interactive lectures 19, 23, 24.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%