2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-42331-5_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating and Maintaining Play Connection in a Toddler Peer Group

Abstract: This study explores how one and two year old peers (henceforth toddlers) participate in joint play activities in a natural group-care setting. We focus on joint play activity between three toddler peers during one full day-care day in a Finnish toddler classroom. Questions guiding the analysis concern the sequential understanding of how play emerges within peer interaction and how toddler peers are able to build sustained co-participation in their joint play during the day. The analysis showed that joint play … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stance taken by the recipients in their response turns demonstrated their assessment of the object and its noteworthiness, and it confirmed or rejected the speaker's stance. Peer responses involved a continuum of actions: the recipients could i) ignore the summons, ii) respond with a neutral stance, simply acknowledging the speaker or the object through gaze, iii) respond with a different, incongruent, stance that contradicted the peer's claim of noteworthiness, or iv) align with the prior speaker by displaying a congruent affective stance (e.g., Cekaite and Andr en, 2019;Pursi and Lipponen, 2020). Below we discuss the multimodal interactional organization of children's initiating turns and outline the various interactional trajectories that emerged through peer responses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stance taken by the recipients in their response turns demonstrated their assessment of the object and its noteworthiness, and it confirmed or rejected the speaker's stance. Peer responses involved a continuum of actions: the recipients could i) ignore the summons, ii) respond with a neutral stance, simply acknowledging the speaker or the object through gaze, iii) respond with a different, incongruent, stance that contradicted the peer's claim of noteworthiness, or iv) align with the prior speaker by displaying a congruent affective stance (e.g., Cekaite and Andr en, 2019;Pursi and Lipponen, 2020). Below we discuss the multimodal interactional organization of children's initiating turns and outline the various interactional trajectories that emerged through peer responses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%