Creating culturally sustainable agri-environmental schemes

Abstract

a b s t r a c tEvidence is emerging from across Europe that contemporary agri-environmental schemes are having only limited, if any, influence on farmers' long-term attitudes towards the environment. In this theoretical paper we argue that these approaches are not 'culturally sustainable', i.e. the actions are not becoming embedded within farming cultures as part of conventional 'good farming' practice. We propose (following Bourdieu) that, in order to culturally embed the environmental values, beliefs and knowledges that underlie such schemes, policy-makers need to devise approaches that allow the creation of cultural and social capital within farming communities e rather than simply compensating for economic capital lost. We outline the theoretical basis of our position and discuss how the contemporary agri-environmental approach of paying for specified environmental management services restricts the ability of such schemes to generate cultural and, thereby, social capital. Finally, we outline two possible ways of accounting for cultural capital in scheme creation: either through the development of measures of cultural capital that enable its incorporation into contemporary economic models or through a major revision to the way we construct and apply agri-environmental schemes.

The influence of farmer demographic characteristics on environmental behaviour: A review

“…Second, as with experience, education has been associated with the level of cultural capital held by an individual via status generated by improved efficacy of management (Burton & Paragahawewa, 2011). As with cultural capital derived from experience, education can thus tie people into socially accepted courses of action.…”

Sustainability—Risk—Resilience: How Does the Case of the Good Agricultural and Environmental Conditions Measure up?

“…The question of "acceptance" by farmers is not only not new, it is also less relevant to the adoption of GAEC. The prevailing debate on acceptance focuses on either the objective factors, or farmers' subjective attitudes with regard to the adoption of multi-annual agri-environmental agreements under more advanced conditions [66][67][68][69][70]. To summarise, the prevailing debate is almost never about GAEC.…”

An Eco-Egalitarian Solution to the Capitalist Consumer Paradox: Integrating Short Food Chains and Public Market Systems

“…Proximity enables actors in SFC to constitute themselves as an alternative confronting the dominant, commercial model, and oligopolistic self-service stores [40][41][42]. Therefore, SFC are important for empowering small and medium-sized farmers and consumers to diminish the control that transnational agri-business has over global value chains, and this increases their capacity to determine production and distribution to the consumer [43,44].…”