Creating geographies of hope through film: performing space in Palestine‐Israel

Abstract

This paper explores the value and role of critical notions of space in the current impasse in Palestine‐Israel through a case study on two films and their creative use of space. The main aim of the paper is to illustrate that it is useful for geographers to use analyses of performance in order to theorise space in more hopeful ways, particularly in areas of conflict, by stressing the importance of space as open‐ended and performative. Through a discussion of two films, one by Elia Suleiman and the other by Michel Khleifi and Eyal Sivan, the paper argues that space, if imagined as dynamic, in‐between and potentially connecting Palestinians and Israelis, can be transformative and have a positive role to play in interrogating us/them relationships, power inequalities and Othering in the region. The paper highlights the value of using third space and performance to help create a spatial politics of affect, which may in turn lead to changing perceptions of the Other in conflict regions. Therefore, the paper makes a contribution, not only to the geographical literature on how space is appropriated and constructed in Palestine‐Israel, but also to geographical work on hope, film and performance.

Indigenous geographies II

“…In that second mode, postcolonial theory speculates that hybridity in the contact zone will generate excess creative diversity, contradictions for the patronizing hierarchies of colonial discourse and, thereby, scope for subaltern agency to displace neo/colonialism. Although geographers returned late to those possibilities, they are now placed at the forefront of the geographies of hope (Mavroudi, 2012), opportunities for belonging in the Anthropocene (Gibson-Graham, 2011) and postneoliberal strategies (Radcliffe, 2012). Yet it is precisely because those possibilities are born of contradiction, messiness and the influence of the past that the oracular visions of postcolonial theory cannot be precise, and that the emancipatory projects which it foreshadows are often compromised, fragile or contested.…”