Camilleri puts forth the idea of the post-psychophysical: training is moving beyond the mindbody binary towards the complexity of negotiating the bodyworld. Performance practices today embrace an ever-wider range of what voice can do and be as well as what role it takes in a larger composition. What does this mean for training? This article proposes that there is a growing need for non-anthropocentric compositional voice practices. It proposes a voice training which draws on new materialism, object-oriented feminism (OOF), and aurality studies and employs strategies from theatre in the dark. Theorists such as Eidsheim and Kendrick argue that ocularcentrism, the privilege of sight in Western culture, is so normalised that radical strategies are needed to return to the potentiality of sound. The article describes a case study at the Norwegian Theatre Academy, in which training the voice in darkness was explored. It outlines two exercises and discusses an alternative theoretical/practical base for the human sounder in relation to dynamic worlds. Key areas discussed are how darkness facilitates: voicing self/selves; voicing together -(de)composition; plasticity as a way to talk about sound objects/actions; and applying Home-Cook's 'tending to', Jarvis's performing (im)materiality of darkness and Machon's discussions of the haptic and (syn)aesthetic as training principles. This article aims to contribute to the intersection of the fields of new materialism, aurality, theatre in the dark and deviser training.