2004
DOI: 10.1108/07378830410524567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating metadata practices for MIT’s OpenCourseWare Project

Abstract: The MIT libraries were called upon to recommend a metadata scheme for the resources contained in MIT’s OpenCourseWare (OCW) project. The resources in OCW needed descriptive, structural, and technical metadata. The SCORM standard, which uses IEEE Learning Object Metadata for its descriptive standard, was selected for its focus on educational objects. However, it was clear that the Libraries would need to recommend how the standard would be applied and adapted to accommodate needs that were not addressed in the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first set was composed of 4426 LOM instances corresponding to an equal number of PDF Learning Objects provided in 135 courses in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the MIT Open Courseware site. These metadata have been manually generated by expert catalogers in the MIT OCW team [24]. The metadata downloading was performed on January 12nd 2008.…”
Section: Quality Metrics Comparison Between Two Metadata Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first set was composed of 4426 LOM instances corresponding to an equal number of PDF Learning Objects provided in 135 courses in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the MIT Open Courseware site. These metadata have been manually generated by expert catalogers in the MIT OCW team [24]. The metadata downloading was performed on January 12nd 2008.…”
Section: Quality Metrics Comparison Between Two Metadata Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IMS-CP is in use in various projects (Australian Flexible Learning Framework, 2004a, b, c;Coalition for Networked Information, 2003, p19), and is recognised as the learning community's alternative to METS and MPEG-21 (Coalition for Networked Information, 2003;Ockerbloom et al, 2004). SCORM (Advanced Distributed Learning, 2004), another learning community solution also based on IMS specifications (Coalition for Networked Information, 2003) is also in use (Lubas, 2004). However, by the time it was identified as a possible candidate, it had already been agreed that the proposed future MoPark connection with the learning community was a relatively weak one and that there was no need to assess SCORM as one of the options.…”
Section: Ims-cpmentioning
confidence: 99%