Creating Orthographies for Endangered Languages 2017
DOI: 10.1017/9781316562949.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating Orthographies for Endangered Languages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relevant issue is that, in the medieval period, Galician and Portuguese were written with similar spellings, while, in the second half of the 20th century, they used different ones. This is in accordance with the claim made by Jones and Mooney (2017): "the use of Spanish orthographic conventions may help to distinguish Galician from Portuguese, to which it is linguistically more similar". • Galician comes closer to both Spanish and Portuguese since the 20th century.…”
Section: Final Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The relevant issue is that, in the medieval period, Galician and Portuguese were written with similar spellings, while, in the second half of the 20th century, they used different ones. This is in accordance with the claim made by Jones and Mooney (2017): "the use of Spanish orthographic conventions may help to distinguish Galician from Portuguese, to which it is linguistically more similar". • Galician comes closer to both Spanish and Portuguese since the 20th century.…”
Section: Final Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Besides the American researchers, British scholars are actively involved in the process of designing the writing system for unwritten languages. In particular, at the University of Cambridge, there is a group of scholars engaged in documentation of endangered languages and cultures, Mary Jones, the editor of "Creating a writing system for endangered languages" (Jones, Mooney, 2017) being the head of the group.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%