2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating sentiment dictionaries via triangulation

Abstract: * endorsed by SIGNLL-ACL's Special Interest Group on Natural Language Learning * endorsed by SIGANN-ACL's Special Interest Group for Annotation * Extended versions of the best papers will be chosen for a special issue of the Decision Support Systems journal (published by Elsevier).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on this promise, various researchers have focused on developing and improving sentiment dictionaries (Balahur et al, 2011;Maks & Vossen, 2012;Steinberger et al, 2012;Tufiş & Ştefănescu, 2012). This research has also strived to go beyond the typical sentiment-detection problems to emphasize multilingual sentiment analysis (Steinberger et al, 2012), actor subjectivity (Maks & Vossen, 2012), and irony detection (Reyes & Rosso, 2012). Recent research has also focused on going beyond supervised lexicon development to semi-automatic and automatic machine learning approaches (Bai, 2011;Duric & Song, 2012).…”
Section: Sentiment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on this promise, various researchers have focused on developing and improving sentiment dictionaries (Balahur et al, 2011;Maks & Vossen, 2012;Steinberger et al, 2012;Tufiş & Ştefănescu, 2012). This research has also strived to go beyond the typical sentiment-detection problems to emphasize multilingual sentiment analysis (Steinberger et al, 2012), actor subjectivity (Maks & Vossen, 2012), and irony detection (Reyes & Rosso, 2012). Recent research has also focused on going beyond supervised lexicon development to semi-automatic and automatic machine learning approaches (Bai, 2011;Duric & Song, 2012).…”
Section: Sentiment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hatzivassiloglou and McKeown (1997) report that fully automated sentiment tools can identify sentiment words and their respective polarity in sentences with an accuracy level (compared to human experts) as high as 82 percent. Based on this promise, various researchers have focused on developing and improving sentiment dictionaries (Balahur et al, 2011;Maks & Vossen, 2012;Steinberger et al, 2012;Tufiş & Ştefănescu, 2012). This research has also strived to go beyond the typical sentiment-detection problems to emphasize multilingual sentiment analysis (Steinberger et al, 2012), actor subjectivity (Maks & Vossen, 2012), and irony detection (Reyes & Rosso, 2012).…”
Section: Sentiment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9) New Avenues in OM and Sentiment Analysis, which have valuable, vast, and unstructured information about public opinion was proposed by Cambria, et al, [12] where history, current use, and future of OM and sentiment analysis were discussed, with techniques and tools. 10) Steinberger et al [13] suggested a semi-automatic method for creating dictionaries of opinion in different languages and launched high-level opinion dictionaries for two languages and automatic translation into a third language. The words discovered in the word list of the target language are normally used similarly to the meaning of the word in the two source languages.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the largest part of the state of the art lexicons focuses on the English language, Italian lexical databases are mostly created by translating and adapting the English ones (Steinberger et al, 2012;Baldoni et al, 2012;Hernandez-Farias et al, 2014).…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%