2019
DOI: 10.1080/15710882.2019.1596288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating tangible interactions with cultural heritage: lessons learned from a large scale, long term co-design project

Abstract: We reflect on the process, outcomes and value generated by applying co-design to a large scale, long-term (4 years) collaboration involving designers, developers and cultural heritage professionals, with the goal of creating a platform for the realisation of tangible interactive installations. The project was pioneering in establishing and sustaining co-design for the introduction of sector-changing technology into the museum domain. We gathered extensive data about the co-design process itself, including inte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Codesign processes for cultural heritage are increasingly characterized by a wide variety of stakeholders that include, in addition to different heritage institutions, groups of experts, enthusiastic volunteers, students and teachers, and visitors. As in other cases [66], their involvement is crucial above all for the development of long-term projects that can trigger significant experiences for the participants and positive effects on the heritage in terms of visibility, protection, preservation, management, and improvement. Similar approaches are supported by the Faro Convention, which focuses on the role that heritage can play for society, and not on heritage itself [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Codesign processes for cultural heritage are increasingly characterized by a wide variety of stakeholders that include, in addition to different heritage institutions, groups of experts, enthusiastic volunteers, students and teachers, and visitors. As in other cases [66], their involvement is crucial above all for the development of long-term projects that can trigger significant experiences for the participants and positive effects on the heritage in terms of visibility, protection, preservation, management, and improvement. Similar approaches are supported by the Faro Convention, which focuses on the role that heritage can play for society, and not on heritage itself [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There also needs to be clarity on the time frame of interest, which can range from 5 to 100 years. However, 5 years is too short for climate change impacts and 100 years-notionally four generations-is too far away for many to envisage (Inayatullah, 2013;Kingsborough et al, 2017;Avram et al, 2019;Nilsson et al, 2019). Potentially a period of 25-50 years, in our experience, can offer an useful balance but must include implications prioritized by the stakeholders Lacher et al, 2019).…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Such approaches reflect a broader notion of the role of digital technologies in supporting co-creation (Holdgaard and Klastrup, 2014; Jun and Lee, 2014; Smørdal et al , 2014; Avram et al , 2020). Co-creation can come from self-directed participation (like taking photos posing with art) or longer-term participation (examples include the infamous Ugly Renaissance Babies 3 or Nipples at the Met 4 ).…”
Section: Reviewing Data Use In Museums and Galleriesmentioning
confidence: 99%