Creating Urban Sociality in Middle–Class Neighborhoods in Milan and Bologna: A Study on the Social Streets Phenomenon

Abstract

Social Streets are groups of neighbors who want to recreate convivial ties having noticed a weakening of social relationships in their roads of residence. Social Streets start as online Facebook groups to materialize in offline encounters, using conviviality to create virtuous bonds. These are carried out through practices of sociality, inclusive and for free. The main focus of this article is analyzing sociodemographic data of the “Streeters” and of the neighborhoods to understand where they produce conviviality in urban neighborhoods. To do this, the article examines two Italian cities which have the highest number of Social Streets: Milan (72) and Bologna (65). Sociodemographic data from the online survey on “Streeters” in Milan (618 respondents) and Bologna (577 respondents), together with census data from 2011 provided by Istat, have been used. Results show that most “Streeters” are not originally from Bologna and Milan, have a high level of education, and are fully embedded in civic engagement. Through conviviality, Social Streets produce a sense of attachment and can represent a good tool to fight isolation and loneliness in the urban setting.

Inside a Safe Place:

“…Some interviewees told us that, at the end of formal, in-person meetings, group members could stay in the social club headquarters to eat a pizza together. Many people interviewed highlighted the importance of this 'pizza moment,' which is seen as a fundamental occasion of sharing, discussion, and socialisation and that can be interpreted as a form of conviviality (Neal et al 2019;Morelli 2019). A coeliac person told us, "I cannot eat pizza, but I stay anyway [...] just to chat."…”

Learning Democratic Attitudes and Skills: Politics and Volunteer Engagement

“…To create opportunities for participation and to break the "iron law" of the model from its social centrality, volunteer engagement in associations and more or less structured organizational networks acting on the territory can be greatly important. These networks create opportunities and stimuli to rstly involve even the sectors of the population that are less endowed with economic and cultural resources-as well as those that are further away from politics-and secondly produce self-esteem, con dence in collective action, and a feeling of social effectiveness through their actions (Biorcio et al, 2011;Morelli, 2019). The associative networks "constitute mobilization agencies that stimulate or facilitate participative behavior on the part of more or less large sectors of the population" (Sani, 1996, 506).…”

Fostering social cohesion at the neighbourhood scale: the role of two Social Streets in Ferrara and Verona

“…The privatization of public spaces is becoming a widespread phenomenon, which can be traced in various patterns, from entirely gated communities to gated parks, or private consumer spaces like shopping malls and entertainment centres (Blokland 2017). Moreover, the privatization of cities is not only a matter of ownership, but it is strongly linked with the depoliticisation of public spaces as arenas for participation, contestation, and negotiation (Giddens 1990;Mitchell 2003;Rosanvallon 2008;Somers 2008;Harvey 2012).…”