2014
DOI: 10.3127/ajis.v18i3.1104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating Value through Virtual Teams: A Current Literature Review

Abstract: Globally, virtual teams (VT) as ICT-enabled emergent network organisation forms have gained international validity by innovative organisations, with a corresponding surge of interest in understanding how organisations can leverage VT to create business value. Despite growing deliberations in VT literature on managing VT, tasks and outcomes, however, creating business value through VT remains an unresolved theoretical and pragmatic conundrum. A review of prior relevant literature is essential to advancing knowl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They collaborate, experience openness in their networks and partnerships, and premise interactions on mutual trust, respect, and support (Bolam et al 2005, Stoll et al 2006). Like their face-to-face counterparts, successful virtual teams of teachers ensure effective communication; develop processes for knowledge sharing; ensure relational trust; and support the growth of interpersonal skills in virtual workplace spaces (Chatfield et al 2014). These virtual teacher teams can be explicitly premised on a sociocultural theory of learning where novice participants engage in legitimate peripheral participation and become more proficient in the practices of the group (Lave and Wenger 1991).…”
Section: Virtual Teams In Education Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They collaborate, experience openness in their networks and partnerships, and premise interactions on mutual trust, respect, and support (Bolam et al 2005, Stoll et al 2006). Like their face-to-face counterparts, successful virtual teams of teachers ensure effective communication; develop processes for knowledge sharing; ensure relational trust; and support the growth of interpersonal skills in virtual workplace spaces (Chatfield et al 2014). These virtual teacher teams can be explicitly premised on a sociocultural theory of learning where novice participants engage in legitimate peripheral participation and become more proficient in the practices of the group (Lave and Wenger 1991).…”
Section: Virtual Teams In Education Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless virtual teams of teachers may rarely meet in face-to-face settings and conduct most of their decision making and communication using digital tools. Furthermore, they can support positive outcomes because they enable highly specialised or qualified teachers to contribute to an online group regardless of their geographical location (Chatfield et al 2014).…”
Section: Virtual Teams In Education Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In their review of case studies on virtual teams Chatfield et al (2013) identified key organisational challenges in the virtual environment as "effective communication, knowledge sharing, trust, and interpersonal skills". Walther (1996) and Han and Beyerlein (2014, 16) found evidence that "virtual interactions can lead to development of more intense interpersonal relationships than face-to-face interactions, because virtual interactions allow individuals more control over how they present themselves".…”
Section: Negotiating Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…452-453). The shift toward this new form of working (GVTs) has been reported to have its set of challenges in management (Chatfield et al , 2014; Jimenez et al , 2017; Lukić and Vračar, 2018). Few decades ago these challenges were only confined to expatriates, but due to rapid globalization, employees working in cross-cultural environments across different industries face these challenges on day to day basis (Ng et al , 2012).…”
Section: Review Of Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%