2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1053-2498(99)00133-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creatinine-based estimation of rate of long term renal function loss in lung transplant recipients. Which method is preferable?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
23
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This measurement is superior especially in populations such as LTx, where long-term changes in muscle mass confound creatinine-based renal function estimates (23). A comparison of this method with the more widely available eGFR calculations was published in an early subgroup (N = 40) from this cohort in 2000 (23), showing that renal function loss is underestimated by creatinine-derived renal function estimates in LTx recipients. Another strength of this study is the availability of serial CNI trough levels in never smokers and groups of former smokers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measurement is superior especially in populations such as LTx, where long-term changes in muscle mass confound creatinine-based renal function estimates (23). A comparison of this method with the more widely available eGFR calculations was published in an early subgroup (N = 40) from this cohort in 2000 (23), showing that renal function loss is underestimated by creatinine-derived renal function estimates in LTx recipients. Another strength of this study is the availability of serial CNI trough levels in never smokers and groups of former smokers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimated GFR was calculated with the abbreviated MDRD, which has not been extensively validated in lung or heart-lung transplant patients. It is conceivable that patients with advanced lung disease have low muscle mass such that their serum creatinine and the formulas based on it are grossly inaccurate (46). In addition, knowledge of medication use that might interact with CNI to exacerbate renal dysfunction such as vancomycin and others was not available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Recent studies suggest that the formulas are similarly limited in estimating kidney function in lung and heart recipients as well. 12,13 The largest and most comprehensive study of CKD prevalence after solid-organ transplantation used a definition of GFR of Ͻ30 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 body surface area, calculated with the fourvariable MDRD equation. Applying this definition to a data set from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR), Ojo et al 1 reported a CKD prevalence at 5 yr after transplantation of 21.3% among intestine recipients, 18.1% among liver recipients, 15.8% among lung recipients, 10.9% among heart recipients, and 6.9% among heart-lung recipients.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Ckd After Nonrenal Organ Transplantationmentioning
confidence: 99%