Creation of a 3D Digital Fashion Show with 3D Virtual Prototyping of Clothing

Kang, Juyoung

doi:10.31274/itaa_proceedings-180814-1837

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

(2 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…기존 슬랙스 패턴 6종 (Amstrong, 1995;Choi et al, 2007;Kang & Suh, 2002;Kim & Kim, 2000;Müller & Shon, 1954;Nam et al, 2007) Maximum growth of circumference 5.85% (Cho, 1999) 8.33% (Park, 1993a) 23.71% (Park, 1993a) (Nam et al, 2007) 0.0 6.3 (Nam et al, 2007) -3.8 Max.…”

Section: 슬랙스 패턴의 여유분 적용mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…선행 연구의 슬랙스 패턴 (Amstrong, 1995;Choi et al, 2007;Kang & Suh, 2002;Kim & Kim, 2000;Müller & Shon, 1954;Nam et al, 2007) (Cho, 1999;Hahm, 1981;Miyoshi, 1989;Park, 1993a;Park, 1993b Table 3과 같다. 기존 슬랙스 패턴 6종 (Amstrong, 1995;Choi et al, 2007;Kang & Suh, 2002;Kim & Kim, 2000;Müller & Shon, 1954;Nam et al, 2007) Maximum growth of circumference 5.85% (Cho, 1999) 8.33% (Park, 1993a) 23.71% (Park, 1993a) (Nam et al, 2007) 0.0 6.3 (Nam et al, 2007) -3.8 Max.…”

Section: 슬랙스 패턴의 여유분 적용mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Establishing Quantitative Evaluation Standards for the Mobility test of Slacks

Kim¹,

Nam²

2016

Fashion & Textile Research Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

: This study presents quantitative evaluation standards for they mobility test, conducted in the process of a slacks fit test. This study quantified the subjects' evaluation on the wearability of slacks to provide objective qualitative evaluation methods for existing mobility tests. The subjects were women of standard bodytype between the ages of 18 and 24 wearing slacks designed to test their mobility based on differences in ease in waist girth, hip girth, crotch length and knee length. A qualitative evaluation tested the wearability of slacks. Clothing pressure and gap area between the body and slacks were measured based on a quantitative evaluation. The clothing pressure and the gap area between the body and slacks (which reflect the results of the wearability test) were presented in this study as quantitative evaluation standards. Clothing pressure tended to increase as the ease of slacks decreased; however, clothing pressure standards, that induce discomfort, differed by body parts. The hip, crotch, and knee area were relatively less sensitive despite the waist and the abdominal area sensitivity to clothing pressure. This study suggests the minimum ease for the appropriate wearing comfort of slacks by region and motion as standards for the quantitative evaluation of mobility tests. These was reset in accordance to the limits of clothing pressure when the minimum ease was considered as wearable but exceeded the clothing pressure limits.

show abstract

Section: 슬랙스 패턴의 여유분 적용mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: 슬랙스 패턴의 여유분 적용mentioning

confidence: 99%