2009 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security 2009
DOI: 10.1109/ths.2009.5168102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creation of robot for subsurface void detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since disaster rubble is often comprised of irregular shapes and materials, as opposed to level terrain, this approach is not appropriate for USAR. Work has been carried out using autonomous vehicles equipped with GPRs for detecting subsurface voids in mining operations (Wilson et al, 2009); however, this approach requires Figure 2.3: An example of a Matilda ground robot utilizing tracks for locomotion (Munkeby et al, 2002). heavy equipment, level terrain and a mobile platform traversing the area of inspection.…”
Section: Ground-based Roboticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since disaster rubble is often comprised of irregular shapes and materials, as opposed to level terrain, this approach is not appropriate for USAR. Work has been carried out using autonomous vehicles equipped with GPRs for detecting subsurface voids in mining operations (Wilson et al, 2009); however, this approach requires Figure 2.3: An example of a Matilda ground robot utilizing tracks for locomotion (Munkeby et al, 2002). heavy equipment, level terrain and a mobile platform traversing the area of inspection.…”
Section: Ground-based Roboticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The operation of remote ground robots inside mines has aided in the detection of underground voids [29]; remote operation allows operators to stay within a safe environment while inspecting for underground spaces in mines. Similar approaches have been applied to USAR; navigation systems allowing ground robots to traverse difficult terrain within the USAR domain have been developed [30], However, USAR rubble zones typically consist of chaotic terrain, limiting the extent to which ground robots are able to operate [31].…”
Section: Ground-based Roboticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since disaster rubble is often comprised of irregular shapes and materials, as opposed to level terrain, this approach is not directly appropriate for USAR. Work has been carried out using autonomous vehicles for detecting subsurface voids in mining operations (Wilson, Gurung, Paaso, & Wallace, ); however, this approach requires heavy equipment, level terrain, and a mobile platform traversing the area of inspection. USAR terrain is inevitably cluttered and chaotic, making effective ground locomotion problematic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%