Creativity and Innovation in Organizations 2018
DOI: 10.4324/9780203732427-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creative and innovative performance: a meta-analysis of relationships with task, citizenship, and counterproductive job performance dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Another limitation stems from the reliance of our findings from a single software engineering job in an information technology firm. Despite the calls in the literature on job performance and its dimensions for more samples from this type of jobs and industry (e.g., Harari et al, ), the specificity of our sample inevitably restricts the generalization of our findings. Still, it has the advantage of reducing the likelihood of these contextual factors influencing our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another limitation stems from the reliance of our findings from a single software engineering job in an information technology firm. Despite the calls in the literature on job performance and its dimensions for more samples from this type of jobs and industry (e.g., Harari et al, ), the specificity of our sample inevitably restricts the generalization of our findings. Still, it has the advantage of reducing the likelihood of these contextual factors influencing our results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In parallel, innovative performance has emerged as an important criterion for human resource management decision‐making, particularly concerning the selection and development of innovative potential (Hülsheger et al, ; Potočnik et al, ). In fact, recent meta‐analytical evidence has showed that, despite being linked with previous well‐established job performance dimensions of task, citizenship performance, and counterproductive behaviors (see Campbell & Wiernik, ; Rotundo & Sackett, , for reviews), innovative performance is still empirically unique and distinct from them (Harari et al, ). Further research efforts focused on the nomological network of innovation‐related have also contributed to clarify its behavioral scope as a performance criterion (Anderson et al, ; Potočnik & Anderson, ).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…C. H. Campbell et al, ). Future research should also examine a wider range of performance constructs, such as specific components of technical performance, leadership, and effort (J. P. Campbell & Wiernik, ), as well as emerging performance dimensions, such as innovation (Harari, Reaves, & Viswesvaran, ) and environmentally‐sustainable behaviors (Ones & Dilchert, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to fully understand how engagement could be translated into performance, future research should be aimed at identifying alternative forms of extra-role behaviors which could act as mediators within this context. Given the dynamic nature of the ICT environment, three extra-role behaviors could play a significant role in this regard: employee pro-activity (Salanova and Schaufeli 2008), organizational citizenship behaviors (Kim and Park 2017) and pro-social behaviors (Harari et al 2016). Salanova and Schaufeli (2008) argued that for engagement to translate into both innovation and performance, employees need to exert proactive behaviors.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%