Creative encounters of a posthuman kind – anthropocentric law, artificial intelligence, and art

Kalpokienė, Julija; Kalpokas, Ignas

doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102197

Cited by 17 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Additionally, this negative bias might be influenced by concerns about the potential implications of AI-generated art on the art world, such as the devaluation of human-created art and the loss of artistic jobs as AI technology becomes more cost-effective, fast, and accessible 62 . Furthermore, some people may think AI-art is unethical due to the ongoing dispute about the use of copyrighted art images in the AI algorithm trainings [63][64][65] . As a result, www.nature.com/scientificreports/ individuals with a high creative identity may not only appreciate human-generated art more but also actively resist the adoption of AI-generated art due to their emotional investment in the traditional artistic process.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding how personality traits, experiences, and attitudes shape negative bias toward AI-generated artworks

Grassini,

Koivisto

2024

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study primarily aimed to understand whether individual factors could predict how people perceive and evaluate artworks that are perceived to be produced by AI. Additionally, the study attempted to investigate and confirm the existence of a negative bias toward AI-generated artworks and to reveal possible individual factors predicting such negative bias. A total of 201 participants completed a survey, rating images on liking, perceived positive emotion, and believed human or AI origin. The findings of the study showed that some individual characteristics as creative personal identity and openness to experience personality influence how people perceive the presented artworks in function of their believed source. Participants were unable to consistently distinguish between human and AI-created images. Furthermore, despite generally preferring the AI-generated artworks over human-made ones, the participants displayed a negative bias against AI-generated artworks when subjective perception of source attribution was considered, thus rating as less preferable the artworks perceived more as AI-generated, independently on their true source. Our findings hold potential value for comprehending the acceptability of products generated by AI technology.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding how personality traits, experiences, and attitudes shape negative bias toward AI-generated artworks

Grassini,

Koivisto

2024

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Due to their exceptional qualities, humans are deemed deserving of a superior level of consideration in comparison to both natural and synthetic entities. Consequently, this perspective grants humans the entitlement to utilize other beings or elements as tools, solely for the advancement of human well-being (Kalpokiene & Kalpokas, 2023). Humans use their free will to manage the environment (Aviste & Niemiec, 2023;Ho, Nguyen, Nguyen, La, & Vuong, 2022).…”

Section: Anthropocentric Study On the Role Of Human Power In The Hous...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Anthropocentric Study on the Role of Human Power in the Household Waste Management System of the Bajo Tribe Settlement in Boalemo, Gorontalo

Yusrifa1,

Wilson,

Mardiyah

2024

Digital Press Social Sciences and Humanities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Bajo tribe, inhabiting the coastal area of Tilamuta in Boalemo Regency, Gorontalo, has established sea-based settlements over several decades. As a community famously referred to as the "people of the sea," the Bajo people maintain a close connection with the marine environment, relying heavily on marine resources for sustenance. Paradoxically, the management of household waste in the Bajo Boalemo settlement contradicts the purported harmonious relationship between the Bajo people and the marine ecosystem. This study aims to comprehensively investigate, identify, and analyze the human power influencing the household waste management system in the Bajo Tribe settlement in Boalemo, Gorontalo. Employing a combination of qualitative and quantitative methodologies, including in-depth interviews and literature reviews, the research delves into the present perceptions, behaviours, and attitudes of the Bajo people in Tilamuta regarding household waste management in their community. The findings reveal that a majority of Bajo residents in Tilamuta acknowledge the detrimental impact of solid inorganic waste on the marine environment, recognizing its adverse effects on the quality of life for marine biota. In contrast, they view solid organic waste, such as food scraps and losses, and liquid waste, like sewage, as environmentally friendly, leading to intentional disposal into the sea, which is, in fact, harmful to the environment. Despite awareness of the risks associated with solid inorganic waste, occasional disposal into the sea persists, underscoring a form of anthropocentrism where convenience often outweighs environmental considerations. Addressing this issue requires a pivotal role from the government, involving raising awareness, disseminating crucial information about waste and its environmental impacts, and providing suitable facilities for waste management in Tilamuta. This study underscores the necessity of proactive measures to align the Bajo people's practices with sustainable environmental stewardship.

show abstract

“…Заслуживает внимания, что некоторые цивилисты из бывших прибалтийских республик СССР, видимо глубоко проникшиеся расистскими идеями движения BLM («позитивная дискриминация»), считают, что под таким «человеком» (антропос), который перестает быть единственной целью права, следует понимать только привилегированную часть человечества, а именно мужчин, являющихся представителями белой расы. Поэтому постгуманизм трактуется ими не как античеловеческий, а как радикально эгалитарный 19 . Так, ученый из новой, «заморской» метрополии прибалтийских колоний отмечает, что антропоцентричный эталон права трактуется как «полностью гендерная, расовая конструкция», основанная на предположении о белом мужском превосходстве и господстве 20 .…”

Section: аксиома антропоцентричной модели права интеллектуальной собс...unclassified

The Legal Regime of the AI Generated Results: Anthropocentrism vs. Transhumanism in the Field of Intellectual Property Law

Bogdanov

2024

Lex Russica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rapid development of technology suggests the advent of a new industrial revolution. Artificial intelligence technology is one of the driving forces of this process that has an increasing impact on socioeconomic relations, changing ideas about the limits of human capabilities in the field of information analysis and data processing. The role of artificial intelligence is not limited to information processing, since its functioning is also aimed at generating creative content. The academic literature indicates that the development of artificial intelligence technology will lead to «seismic» social and economic consequences. It will have a devastating impact on legislation, in particular in the field of intellectual property. The paper defends the thesis that the technological and transhumanistic revolution in intellectual property law has not taken place. The fundamental idea that only a human is the creator provides the basis of intellectual property rights. As a general rule, the results generated by artificial intelligence should remain in the public domain, since neither software developers using artificial intelligence technology nor its users have the right to privatize the intellectual and cultural heritage of human society. The arguments of the authors, who believe that the transfer of the results generated by artificial intelligence into the public domain deprives the developers of this technology of economic incentives are unconvincing. Artificial intelligence technologies have their own economic incentives that justify investments in this area. The new practice of generative artificial intelligence providers to assume the property risks of their users justifies this approach. It can be stated that conditions are emerging for establishing a general model of tort liability for violation by generative intelligence providers of the exclusive rights of authors and other copyright holders.

show abstract

Creative encounters of a posthuman kind – anthropocentric law, artificial intelligence, and art

Cited by 17 publications

References 41 publications

Understanding how personality traits, experiences, and attitudes shape negative bias toward AI-generated artworks

Understanding how personality traits, experiences, and attitudes shape negative bias toward AI-generated artworks

Anthropocentric Study on the Role of Human Power in the Household Waste Management System of the Bajo Tribe Settlement in Boalemo, Gorontalo

The Legal Regime of the AI Generated Results: Anthropocentrism vs. Transhumanism in the Field of Intellectual Property Law

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About