2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-78095-1_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creative Media Accessibility: Placing the Focus Back on the Individual

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CRPD triggered the use of a new type of subtitles: same language subtitles or subtitles for the deaf and hard of hearing ( Neves, 2005 ; Neves, 2008 ), and these subtitles are not considered original work, since they are transcriptions of the dialogue. The issue is that subtitles for the deaf and hard of hearing codifies in writing more information beyond the dialogue, such as sounds, emotions or music ( Rashid et al ., 2006 ; Rashid et al ., 2008 ; Rawsthorn, 2007 ; Romero-Fresco, 2013 ; Romero-Fresco, 2021a ; Romero-Fresco, 2021b ; Rosenberg, 2007 ; Zdenek, 2018 ). There could be the argument that this translation is creative, hence subtitles for the deaf and hard of hearing should also hold copyright — though they don’t.…”
Section: Subtitle Copyright Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRPD triggered the use of a new type of subtitles: same language subtitles or subtitles for the deaf and hard of hearing ( Neves, 2005 ; Neves, 2008 ), and these subtitles are not considered original work, since they are transcriptions of the dialogue. The issue is that subtitles for the deaf and hard of hearing codifies in writing more information beyond the dialogue, such as sounds, emotions or music ( Rashid et al ., 2006 ; Rashid et al ., 2008 ; Rawsthorn, 2007 ; Romero-Fresco, 2013 ; Romero-Fresco, 2021a ; Romero-Fresco, 2021b ; Rosenberg, 2007 ; Zdenek, 2018 ). There could be the argument that this translation is creative, hence subtitles for the deaf and hard of hearing should also hold copyright — though they don’t.…”
Section: Subtitle Copyright Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It includes a preamble and a description of each image (Figiel & Albin, 2022; Taylor & Perego, 2021) to consider not only access to the images but also the wider involvement of experiencing the work (Eardley et al, 2017). The piece builds on the idea of access as a creative, curatorial, and aesthetic practice (Cachia, 2019; Caro, 2016; Cooley & Fox, 2014; Hutchinson & Eardley, 2019; Romero-Fresco, 2021).…”
Section: Curatorial Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tactile objects embrace "radical subjectivity" (Romero-Fresco, 2021) by translating between senses and deviating from standardized audio description. This leads to a new aesthetic that challenges the visual function of art.…”
Section: Access As Creative Inspirationmentioning
confidence: 99%