Creativity, Design and Design Thinking—A Human-Centred ménage à trois for Innovation

Tschimmel, Katja

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-79879-6_1

Cited by 27 publications

(49 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Abductive thinking is a concept developed by Charles Sander Pierce in the 19th century in which perception plays an important role. It can be understood as thinking in new and different perspectives and about future possibilities (Tschimmel, 2012) . Another important principle is the combination of convergent and divergent thinking (Brenner and Uebernickel, 2016).…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The 3-I model consists of the phases Inspiration, Ideation, and Implementation, while the HCD model focuses on Hearing, Creating, and Delivering. The model by the Hasso-Plattner Institute, on the other hand, comprises the phases Understand, Observe, Point of View, Ideate, Prototype, and Test, while the SDT model consists of the four phases Exploration, Creation, Reflection, and Implementation (ibid).An explanation of the models can be found in Tschimmel (2012). Furthermore, the current model of the Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford should be mentioned (Alhazmi and Huang, 2020), which consists of the steps Emphasize, Define, Ideate, Prototype and Test (Plattner, 2010).…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Leveraging design thinking in MBSE: mitigating data and information uncertainties – an integration model approach

Gadzo,

Michalides,

Koch

2024

Proc. Des. Soc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The evolving needs of customers and stakeholders necessitate the collaboration of diverse system elements within a cyber-physical, socio-technical network. Socio-technical systems are characterized by numerous complex interdependencies as well as by endogenous and exogenous influences. A key issue that developers must address is the mitigation of data and information uncertainties. The authors introduce an approach that operationalizes Design Thinking as a supporting sufficient condition within the context of designing system models in the realm of Model-Based Systems Engineering.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Leveraging design thinking in MBSE: mitigating data and information uncertainties – an integration model approach

Gadzo,

Michalides,

Koch

2024

Proc. Des. Soc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…outlining of user experiences), storyboarding and the outlining of personas (i.e. imagining the needs to hypothetical users) (Beckman and Barry, 2007; Veryzer and Borja de Mozota, 2005; Tschimmel, 2012). Indeed, Kurtmollaiev et al (2018) found that user-centered activities such as the development of customer journey maps, emotion cards (i.e.…”

Section: Findings and Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There are very few empirical studies on the actual use of DT in either private or public settings (Mintrom and Luetjens, 2016). The publications on DT training typically are theoretical or review articles (Devitt et al, 2017;Kimbell, 2012;Mintrom and Luetjens, 2016;Tschimmel, 2012). Of the empirical articles on DT training, outcome variables tend to be student final project scores (Roth et al, 2020;Tu et al, 2018) or self-report measures (Kurtmollaiev et al, 2018).…”

Section: Training Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Scholars also promote DT as an effective tool across levels of an organization: for managers, individual creative workers and creative teams (Kurtmollaiev et al , 2018; Roth et al , 2020; Tschimmel, 2012). It has been argued that DT training may be very valuable to improve peoples’ skills in solving creative problems and organizations’ innovative performance (Kurtmollaiev et al , 2018; Tu et al , 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Guidelines for training design thinking in organizations

Todd

Stewart

2023

ICT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to critically review the literature on design thinking training to elucidate guidelines for best practices of design thinking training interventions. Design/methodology/approach The literature was reviewed, which outlined several themes that informed a series of recommendations for organizations considering developing design thinking training. Findings Process-based training, delivery activities and content, skills-based approach, delivery format, support for training and training evaluation were identified as key themes in the literature. These themes highlighted practical recommendations for developing design thinking training interventions. Findings also demonstrate current limitations in the literature. Research limitations/implications Research on design thinking training is limited; therefore, recommendations for training should be applied carefully. The limited research points to a fruitful area for future research and development of design thinking training. Practical implications This paper suggests that researchers and practitioners should develop face-to-face or hybrid design thinking training interventions that follow the design thinking process and focus on the development of relevant skills, using interactive, user-focused and design visualization activities. Results suggest that adequate support for training should be provided, and outcomes of training should be empirically evaluated. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper is the first to review the design thinking training literature and provide general recommendations for both design thinking training development and design thinking research.

show abstract

How Design and Technology Can Contribute to Learning: The Mobeybou in Brazil Educational Game Case Study

Fernandes

Sylla

Martins

et al. 2022

Springer Series in Design and Innovation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Currently, there is a generation of children that tend to be exposed from a very early age to digital media, especially in the most economically and culturally developed societies. Thus, it is necessary to think about ways in which technology can contribute to learning, namely by seeking to converge the recreational component with the educational while preventing or suppressing potential dangers. This study aimed at extending the Mobeybou pedagogical materials, i.e., a Digital Manipulative for storytelling, and a set of interactive story applications, thus integrating the easy access that children have to technologies and the positive characteristics of games. In this context, here we present a descriptive case study of the design process of the interface for a game to be integrated into the Mobeybou in Brazil story app. The game interface is intended to reinforce the knowledge conveyed through the reading of the story app, therefore contributing to the development of language skills, creativity, and digital literacy. The game interface should be easy and intuitive to use, its development followed a design thinking methodology. A pilot test carried out with a group of five children aged between 8 and 9 years-old revealed very encouraging results, showing that the game interface was easy to use and engaged children with the story content.

show abstract

Creativity, Design and Design Thinking—A Human-Centred ménage à trois for Innovation

Cited by 27 publications

References 6 publications

Leveraging design thinking in MBSE: mitigating data and information uncertainties – an integration model approach

Leveraging design thinking in MBSE: mitigating data and information uncertainties – an integration model approach

Guidelines for training design thinking in organizations

How Design and Technology Can Contribute to Learning: The Mobeybou in Brazil Educational Game Case Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About