Creativity for service innovation: a practice-based perspective

Abstract

Purpose – The success of service innovation is largely dependent on creativity. So far, however, the question of how to reinforce creativity in the development of innovative services, while being an important managerial issue, has not attracted much attention from the academics. The purpose of this paper is to fill in this gap, by studying what constitutes capabilities for reinforcing creativity in service innovation, from a practice-based perspective. Design/methodology/approach – Through the theoretical lens of the resource-based view we set out to conduct three case studies in highly service-innovative European research and technology organisations (RTOs). Through 24 interviews and analysis of secondary sources, we collect our data, which are then analysed from a multi-case perspective, in order to gain understanding on the resource-related practices and resulting capabilities for reinforcing creativity in service innovation. Findings – By studying the resource-related practices of reinforcing creativity in service innovation, this study brings about seven relevant capabilities; namely attracting, stimulating, combining, providing, breeding, opening up and accepting. In this perspective, our work represents an important theoretical contribution in terms of explicitly proposing specific capabilities for reinforcing service innovation creativity. Originality/value – The research is original for a couple of reasons. First, creativity in service innovation has not been explicitly studied before, especially through empirical research. Second, our findings offer a set of original capabilities propositions that can be practically applied in service-innovative organisations. Finally, our research is carried out in a novel field, as RTOs have rarely been studied regarding service innovation-related creativity, even though they represent a very interesting type of organisations in this perspective.

Defining service innovation: A review and synthesis

“…Based on our systematic review, the prevalence of the synthesis perspective seems to have been overstated; while the synthesis perspective is growing and gaining strength, the number of articles adopting assimilation or demarcation perspectives has neither decreased nor disappeared. As an example, recent papers have defined service innovation according to the assimilation perspective (e.g., Björk, 2014;Castellacci, 2014;Giannopoulou, Gryszkiewicz, & Barlatier, 2014;Henrike & Schultz, 2014), which suggests that the assimilation perspective might even be regaining its strength. In the following, this research will highlight the differences between the definitions of service innovation in the three perspectives and question and explain why the relevance of the service innovation concept might be lost.…”

How to Enhance Green Service and Green Product Innovation Performance? The Roles of Inward and Outward Capabilities

“…A high level of first‐line employee involvement in planning processes reduces the distance between company managers and the market. The participation of employees in planning may facilitate opportunity recognition, which is critical for innovation (Giannopoulou et al ., ). Knowledge is effectively assimilated through knowledge management systems and knowledge absorption skills embedded in employees' daily routine.…”

Co-creating a Digital Service Concept in Wellbeing for the Elderly

“…Hsieh et al (2013) linked academic classifications of service innovation with practical activities by firms to detail the essence of service innovation by showing that elements of service innovations vary depending on the company size, service innovation experience and industry life cycle. Giannopoulou et al (2014) explored the capabilities for reinforcing creativity in service innovations from a practice-based perspective. As for the findings, seven relevant capabilities were proposed.…”