2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00163-015-0207-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creativity in design teams: the influence of personality traits and risk attitudes on creative concept selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These measures need to be developed and validated for use in design disciplines. In fact, this proposition is argued in another study (Toh & Miller, 2016). Moreover, we acknowledge that our interview results did not allow us to provide a clear-cut insight concerning the effect of design ambiguity on the students.…”
Section: Research Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These measures need to be developed and validated for use in design disciplines. In fact, this proposition is argued in another study (Toh & Miller, 2016). Moreover, we acknowledge that our interview results did not allow us to provide a clear-cut insight concerning the effect of design ambiguity on the students.…”
Section: Research Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Actually, a recently published paper studied the ambiguity and risk aversion of 38 undergraduate engineering students and their design ability. The researchers concluded that ambiguity aversion was important in the phase of generating creative ideas but not in selecting/assessing creative ideas (a subsequent phase) (Toh & Miller, 2016). In addition, students' project grades were not found to be significantly correlated with their divergent thinking abilities (TTCT scores).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the engineering design literature, human evaluators commonly assess design metrics manually (Fu et al, 2010;Gosnell and Miller, 2015;Gyory et al, 2019;Song, Lopez, et al, 2017b;Toh and Miller, 2016). A variety of different metrics can be assessed including, but not limited to, quality, novelty, quantity, feasibility, and usefulness of design ideas.…”
Section: Current Methods Of Assessing Design Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While not specifically studied in the context of creativity throughout the design process, previous research on students' concept selection processes has shown that students often value technical feasibility during the concept selection process [18,38] and select feasible and desirable ideas at the cost of originality [39]. In addition, concept selection has been shown to be largely subject to individual attributes [40], risk taking attitudes [16,41,42], and various cognitive biases and heuristics, such as design fixation [43][44][45], ownership bias [17,46], and the bias against creativity [47]. Specifically, individuals have been said to have an inherent bias against creative ideas due to the risk and uncertainties of creative ideas [39,48], and their judgment of originality has been found to be negatively related to judgments of appropriateness [49].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%