2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10730-009-9102-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Credentialing Clinical Ethics Consultants: Lessons to be Learned

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there is limited evidence on the extent to which the Core Competencies are applied by individual services, and whilst there is some concern that emphasis on competencies reflects the malign influence of managerialism and may divert CES from the primary goal of moral inquiry towards more institutional or bureaucratic goals (King, 1999;Bishop, Fanning, and Bliton, 2009), there is little doubt that debate about the competencies of CES has had a significant impact on the establishment of standards for CES services (Adams, 2009;Bishop, Fanning, and Bliton, 2009). A parallel development to developing practice standards to enhance quality has been the push to professionalise clinical ethics expertise (Tarzian, 2009;Childs, 2009;Frolic and PHEEP Steering Committee, 2012;Acres et al, 2012;Reel, 2012). For some, professionalization is not only necessary and desirable but also inevitable given the increasing emphasis on standards, quality and accountability, concerns about medical liability and the emergence of the patient safety movement (Acres et al, 2012).…”
Section: Optimizing the Quality Of Ces Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there is limited evidence on the extent to which the Core Competencies are applied by individual services, and whilst there is some concern that emphasis on competencies reflects the malign influence of managerialism and may divert CES from the primary goal of moral inquiry towards more institutional or bureaucratic goals (King, 1999;Bishop, Fanning, and Bliton, 2009), there is little doubt that debate about the competencies of CES has had a significant impact on the establishment of standards for CES services (Adams, 2009;Bishop, Fanning, and Bliton, 2009). A parallel development to developing practice standards to enhance quality has been the push to professionalise clinical ethics expertise (Tarzian, 2009;Childs, 2009;Frolic and PHEEP Steering Committee, 2012;Acres et al, 2012;Reel, 2012). For some, professionalization is not only necessary and desirable but also inevitable given the increasing emphasis on standards, quality and accountability, concerns about medical liability and the emergence of the patient safety movement (Acres et al, 2012).…”
Section: Optimizing the Quality Of Ces Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many contributors supported the need for standards and quality measures and acknowledged the shift toward the professionalization of clinical ethics consultants . Others accepted the need for standards but cautioned about losing the heterogeneity among consultants . Jeffrey Spike proposed the accreditation of training programs, rather than the certification of individual consultants, to account for the multidisciplinary nature of clinical ethics …”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%